What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

Requirement 2.9.3

Started by , Feb 16 2009 02:18 PM
6 Replies
Hello again,

Could you help me with this one also?

The version 5 of the BRC requirement 2.9.3 says
"Records associated with monitoring CCPs must be signed by the person responsible for the monitoring and verified, as appropriate, by an authorised person."

My question is: all the records associated with monitoring CCPs must be verified daily. How to understand if the verification in place is appropriate or not?

Thank you in advance,

Vera
Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
What is the requirement for damaged ingredient bags in dry storage area? Liner Bag Requirement for Packaging Plastic Food Packages Requirement of Traded Goods-BRCGS Issue 9 Are there any hygienic design requirement for the dosing and control of MAP gases Toilet Requirement per number of employees
[Ad]
ops...

[center]

all the records associated with monitoring CCPs must be verified daily.

should read: all the records associated with monitoring CCPs must be verified daily?

Vera
We have a couple of CCP's

Pasteurisation is 1 of them. the pasteurisation operator signs to say he has done a divert check (CCP) and the supervisor signs it at the end of each day.

similarly with metal detection

caz x
Hi Caz,
Thank you for sharing what is happening at your site.
At my site, just on the retail production area we have 3 seperate processes (burgers, mince, steaks) and each of the different processes involves 4 CCPs (

Would it be appropriate to expect that all the records related with the monitoring of the CCPs should be verified on a daily basis?
(all the records are already being signed of by the person monitoring the CCPs)

Thank you,

Vera
Dear vera,

IMHO, this BRC para which you refer is another pseudo - ISO clone as evidenced by the word "appropriate". It is basic and correct in standard HACCP techniques to require verification. The exact interpretation is typically arbitrary and many people write their own understanding of the term into their HACCP plan, eg checked by an authorised person, eg HACCP Coordinator, within 24 - 48 hrs whatever. It is also obviously stated that failures of critical points are dealt with immediately. An additional random time - based sampling of this data by a third person is added to reinforce the procedure, perhaps for a 6-month review.

However, in my inspectorial experience, it is typical to see pages of beautiful columns of 100% countersigned data on monitoring sheets all ready for the auditor up to the day he/she arrives. Both parties know that the the verifier would have to be superhuman to actually "audit" this volume of data. Typical examples are 1hr outputs from metal detectors.

To summarise, one cannot say the procedure is wrong, more of a necesary evil.

Rgds / Charles.C

Hi Caz,
Thank you for sharing what is happening at your site.
At my site, just on the retail production area we have 3 seperate processes (burgers, mince, steaks) and each of the different processes involves 4 CCPs (

Would it be appropriate to expect that all the records related with the monitoring of the CCPs should be verified on a daily basis?
(all the records are already being signed of by the person monitoring the CCPs)

Thank you,

Vera



What actually happens with us is that the Team Leader / Supervisor collects the sheets at end of the shift, checks through them and countersigns the sheet once to verify that they are completed, etc etc

C x
Thank you,

Your replies were very useful to help me understand what is required.

kind regards,

Vera

Similar Discussion Topics
What is the requirement for damaged ingredient bags in dry storage area? Liner Bag Requirement for Packaging Plastic Food Packages Requirement of Traded Goods-BRCGS Issue 9 Are there any hygienic design requirement for the dosing and control of MAP gases Toilet Requirement per number of employees Facility specification of cold room as per guideline of EU requirement Do we need to have a sink in the lunch trailer or is the re-entry handwashing requirement sufficient? BRCGS Issue 9 Requirement: 4.9.6.3 - Other Foreign-Body Contaminants Suggestions for the implementation of new additional requirement in FSSC 22000 V6 Costco new requirement on Xray