FSSC - One Standard Acceptable To All
Forgive me if this has already been answered elsewhere.
But, we are currrently being audited many times for ISO, national food standards, customer specs etc. We barely get a chance to asssign action plans to one audit report before we are in the thick of another.
Will FSSC become an one standard to rule them all or is it wishful thinking.
Thanks,
SriramB
Hi ,
Forgive me if this has already been answered elsewhere.
But, we are currrently being audited many times for ISO, national food standards, customer specs etc. We barely get a chance to asssign action plans to one audit report before we are in the thick of another.
Will FSSC become an one standard to rule them all or is it wishful thinking.
Thanks,
SriramB
Sriram
A simple answer - wishful thinking!
However it would be good if there was mutual recognition if standards - in some ways that is what the GFSI is all about, but there is a long was to go on this.
Ken
Hi ,
Forgive me if this has already been answered elsewhere.
But, we are currrently being audited many times for ISO, national food standards, customer specs etc. We barely get a chance to asssign action plans to one audit report before we are in the thick of another.
Will FSSC become an one standard to rule them all or is it wishful thinking.
Thanks,
SriramB
I would say wishfull thinking with a glimmer of hope. It will not necessarily be FSSC that stands alone but the GFSI accepted standards. Most companies will accept any GFSI standard but there are a few that are stuck on certain types or formats.
I actually came online to discuss the ones that are stuck, and am starting a new thread next.
We sometimes have the same auditor/auditors trying to cover more than one standard concurrently, and this may affect the delivery of value from the audit process as the time constraints come into play.
Inventing new standards rather than fixing the existing ones seems to be a wasteful approach
Cheers,
Hi SriramB, I agree with TSmith - worldwide acceptance of the GFSI benchmarked standards is about as close as we can hope for. If pressed to choose one standard it would have to be FSSC 22000.Will FSSC become an one standard to rule them all or is it wishful thinking.
Regards,
Simon
Ajay
You see, we have been asked recently to help a client drive towards BRC - Consumer Product certification for a rubber glove manf. where the product comes under Group 3. Personally I do not agree and would be happy to get them to FSSC 22000 instead since products are used in hospitals, food operations and production. etc. which are risk sensitive industries. So here you go. A manufacturer may just end up having multiple certifications which can be counter productive. Is this a confused world we are living in or just confused bureaucracies?
Gail
IQC - Israel
Having been involved in the food safety industry for the last 18 years, I like to endorse Ken's view again. Its wishful thinking
You see, we have been asked recently to help a client drive towards BRC - Consumer Product certification for a rubber glove manf. where the product comes under Group 3. Personally I do not agree and would be happy to get them to FSSC 22000 instead since products are used in hospitals, food operations and production. etc. which are risk sensitive industries. So here you go. A manufacturer may just end up having multiple certifications which can be counter productive. Is this a confused world we are living in or just confused bureaucracies?
Not at all Gail, check this out: http://www.ifsqn.com...ging-materials' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>PAS 223: PRP’s on food safety for manufacturing Packaging MaterialsI thought that FSSC is only for food manufacturers.
Gail
IQC - Israel
Regards,
Simon