What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

BRC 3.8 Non Conforming Product

Started by , Jan 17 2012 11:25 PM
5 Replies
Looking for some help here...it might just be the wording or it has been a long day but could someone explain the " referral to the brand owner where required" requirement under BRC 3.8?
Thanks so much....I don't post often but this forum is wealth of information on weekly basis!
Thanks to all!
Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
What belts are used in the bakery industry to have a grip on the product Frozen temperature for raw meat product How Often Must Product Specifications Be Reviewed Under FDA/BRCGS? Total spores vs Total plate count in Sterilised product How to Label 'Natural Type Flavors' on US Product Packaging
[Ad]
A company can be composed of several units or different plants (think eg to an international company). Where a non-conforming product has to be managed, the brand owner shall be informed by the plant manager or by the production responsible "when required" (eg destruction, withdrawal, recall and so on).

mauro
1 Thank
Thanks Mauro!

A company can be composed of several units or different plants (think eg to an international company). Where a non-conforming product has to be managed, the brand owner shall be informed by the plant manager or by the production responsible "when required" (eg destruction, withdrawal, recall and so on).

mauro

Hi Bill

I would have a different interpretation of the requirement to 'refer to the brand owner where required'.

My understanding is this applies in situations where a food business is producing product under contract for another company with its own private brand or own brand e.g. Tesco, Walmart, Coca Cola and so on.

It may be a term of such contract business that where a non-conformance of product produced under their brand is detected this must be notified to them even where it has not been released from the manufacturing site.

George.

Hi Bill

I would have a different interpretation of the requirement to 'refer to the brand owner where required'.

My understanding is this applies in situations where a food business is producing product under contract for another company with its own private brand or own brand e.g. Tesco, Walmart, Coca Cola and so on.

It may be a term of such contract business that where a non-conformance of product produced under their brand is detected this must be notified to them even where it has not been released from the manufacturing site.

George.


Yes, this is my understanding too. It would depend on where it is in the process and what your agreements are if you're manufacturing under someone else's brand. Of course any situation where it's left your control they will have to be involved. Also it's worth considering (under UK law anyway) that it is the responsibility of the brand owner to contact the FSA in the event of a recall. So, for example, if you were making Tesco own brand fresh mashed potato and it was contaminated with glass, Tesco would then contact the FSA to instigate a public recall not you. Of course you probably wouldn't have to worry about who would be contacting the FSA in future after an incident like that, you'd certainly not be making Tesco food much longer...
1 Thank
Thanks to all of you!!

Similar Discussion Topics
What belts are used in the bakery industry to have a grip on the product Frozen temperature for raw meat product How Often Must Product Specifications Be Reviewed Under FDA/BRCGS? Total spores vs Total plate count in Sterilised product How to Label 'Natural Type Flavors' on US Product Packaging Supplier withdrawal for metal contamination, but own MDs have not detected in Finished Product Product Recall Expert When Is Product Rework Acceptable? New Product Development New Product Development