What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

ISO/TR 10013: Guidelines for quality management system documentation

Started by , Sep 06 2013 09:21 AM
5 Replies

I am wondering if anyone is familiar with practical side of suggested guidelines in standard ISO/TR 10013. Please, fill free to answer to my poll as I want to use result for my research of this kind of standards with guidelines.

 

Thank you  :mwah:

 

   :thumbup:

Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
Bottled water used as an ingredient: what SQF documentation should we have on file? Internal system audit templates for BRCGS Issue 9 Seeking PPE Guidelines and Standards for Foodservice Environments BRCGS 3.5.4 - Outsourced Process Management How to Validate and Test Your Conveyorized Metal Detection System
[Ad]

 

I am wondering if anyone is familiar with practical side of suggested guidelines in standard ISO/TR 10013. Please, fill free to answer to my poll as I want to use result for my research of this kind of standards with guidelines.

 

Thank you  :mwah:

 

   :thumbup:

 

 

Dear Jelena,

 

Does this poll replace yr first one ??

 

http://www.ifsqn.com...ing/#entry64168

 

Rgds / Charles.C

Dear Jelena,

 

Does this poll replace yr first one ??

 

http://www.ifsqn.com...ing/#entry64168

 

Rgds / Charles.C

 

Dear Simone,

 

No, this is new one for the ISO/TR 10013 and the previous one is for the ISO 10015 ;) Two different things :D

683 views and only 27 votes, interesting...I expected more :(

 

683 views and only 27 votes, interesting...I expected more :(

 

 

My guess is that it means a large number of views are either from non-members, people who dislike polls in general, or  people who are unwilling to admit that they've never heard of anything (a tempting line of thought). Or permutations of. :smile:

 

At least you have surely, statistically, demonstrated that direct usage is  "low"  (ca 3%) and any knowledge of the standard is "lowish" (ca 13%). Presumably not entirely uncorrelated.

 

Rgds / Charles.C

1 Thank

My guess is that it means a large number of views are either from non-members, people who dislike polls in general, or  people who are unwilling to admit that they've never heard of anything (a tempting line of thought). Or permutations of. :smile:

 

At least you have surely, statistically, demonstrated that direct usage is  "low"  (ca 3%) and any knowledge of the standard is "lowish" (ca 13%). Presumably not entirely uncorrelated.

 

Rgds / Charles.C

Thank you, Charles...funny and clever as always  :happydance:


Similar Discussion Topics
Bottled water used as an ingredient: what SQF documentation should we have on file? Internal system audit templates for BRCGS Issue 9 Seeking PPE Guidelines and Standards for Foodservice Environments BRCGS 3.5.4 - Outsourced Process Management How to Validate and Test Your Conveyorized Metal Detection System How to Validate and Test Your Conveyorized Metal Detection System How to Validate and Test Your Conveyorized Metal Detection System Document Numbering System for Multi-Site Operations SQF: Why Environmental Monitoring Is a Pet Food Plant's Early-Warning System World Quality Month November 2025