What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

Part A 5.03 of SQF code 7

Started by , Oct 03 2013 09:54 PM
3 Replies

Just wrapped up level 3 cert audit. Auditor documented major non-conformance due to comnpany receiving a regualtory warning letter in early 2013. Per Part A 5.03 of Edition 7.1 suppliers are required to report any warning letetrs as well as class 1 & 2 recall to the cert body. Discussed the fact that edition 7.1 was not effective until 7/1/13 post receipt of the warning letter. Auditor's stance is that Edition 7 was interpreted to include warning letters as a "regulatory infringement".

Curious if anyone familiar with Edition 7 interpreted this clause to mean that any regulatory infringement other than class 1 & 2 recalls required notification of cert body?

Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
Feels great to be a part of the IFSQN community! Food Traceability Part 204 Does SQF allow only a part of production to be certified? Has anyone been audited for BRCGS 9 Part 2 Using part of a new warehouse for food production
[Ad]

Well done on achieving level 3 certification Chris :clap:

 

Regards,

 

Tony

Just wrapped up level 3 cert audit. Auditor documented major non-conformance due to comnpany receiving a regualtory warning letter in early 2013. Per Part A 5.03 of Edition 7.1 suppliers are required to report any warning letetrs as well as class 1 & 2 recall to the cert body. Discussed the fact that edition 7.1 was not effective until 7/1/13 post receipt of the warning letter. Auditor's stance is that Edition 7 was interpreted to include warning letters as a "regulatory infringement".

Curious if anyone familiar with Edition 7 interpreted this clause to mean that any regulatory infringement other than class 1 & 2 recalls required notification of cert body?

The standard says, " Upon identification that a certified supplier initiates a food safety event that  requires public notification (such as a Class 1 or Class II recall)....   While warning letters are often public, they aren't always nor do they necessarily require public notification.   Did the warning letter require public notification?  If the warning letter was still being dealt with then think it is a gray area, however if you had already resolved the issue before the code took effect, think auditor is being overly stringent. 

So, I'm not getting this Chris. If I read what you wrote correctly you just went thru your FIRST certification audit in September or October of 2013 and this warning letter you received was before you were an SQF "certified" supplier?

 

If that is the case, the Auditor is wrong.


Similar Discussion Topics
Feels great to be a part of the IFSQN community! Food Traceability Part 204 Does SQF allow only a part of production to be certified? Has anyone been audited for BRCGS 9 Part 2 Using part of a new warehouse for food production Device or sensor to check completeness part of packed product Has anyone used a digital app as part of their BRGCS V8 1.1.2 Food safety culture compliance? Is a maintenance workshop part of production Proficiency Testing as part of the SQF 9.0 edition? Considerations when producing part-baked bakery products