Your opinions on MAN as Root Cause and 'No Blame Policy'
Started by Zeeshan, Dec 17 2013 08:14 AM
Dear Members,
What is your personal opinion about tagging causes to MAN while doing root cause analysis under 'No blame policy'. If I am going to follow a 'no blame policy', I should tag all the causes to either 'Machine', 'Material', 'Method', ........ but not 'Man'.
Hope not inducing confusions about traditional 4M Concept ????? :shutup:
Zeeshan.
Can anyone please help me with the response Corrective, Preventative and Root Cause
Risk assessment of clothing and hair policy
Root cause analysis help for SQF audit corrective actions
Audit NC for a Single Ant – Root Cause Advice
Enforcing a policy of no ear buds and talking on the phone in the production room
[Ad]
Hello Zeeshan,
In a robust and joined up root cause analysis process MAN is very much a valid cause, even under a No Blame Policy. However, it is another MAN who is responsible for solving the issue MANagement.
fishbone.jpg 50.33KB 12 downloads
1 Thank
Can anyone please help me with the response Corrective, Preventative and Root Cause
Risk assessment of clothing and hair policy
Root cause analysis help for SQF audit corrective actions
Audit NC for a Single Ant – Root Cause Advice
Enforcing a policy of no ear buds and talking on the phone in the production room
Can We Remove a No-Nut Policy Without Compromising Allergen Safety?
Delivery Driver Hygiene Practices: Policy Examples & Compliance Tips
Unexpected Nutritional Label Variances from Water Addition: Root Cause Analysis
Human Trafficking Policy Request from Supplier – What to Include?
Food Safety Policy Date – Should It Be Updated Annually Even If Unchanged?