Your opinions on MAN as Root Cause and 'No Blame Policy'
Started by Zeeshan, Dec 17 2013 08:14 AM
Dear Members,
What is your personal opinion about tagging causes to MAN while doing root cause analysis under 'No blame policy'. If I am going to follow a 'no blame policy', I should tag all the causes to either 'Machine', 'Material', 'Method', ........ but not 'Man'.
Hope not inducing confusions about traditional 4M Concept ????? :shutup:
Zeeshan.
Delivery Driver Hygiene Practices: Policy Examples & Compliance Tips
Unexpected Nutritional Label Variances from Water Addition: Root Cause Analysis
Human Trafficking Policy Request from Supplier – What to Include?
Food Safety Policy Date – Should It Be Updated Annually Even If Unchanged?
Do Acrylic Doors in Bottling Lines Need to Be Monitored Under Glass and Brittle Plastic Policy?
[Ad]
Hello Zeeshan,
In a robust and joined up root cause analysis process MAN is very much a valid cause, even under a No Blame Policy. However, it is another MAN who is responsible for solving the issue MANagement.
fishbone.jpg 50.33KB 12 downloads
1 Thank
Delivery Driver Hygiene Practices: Policy Examples & Compliance Tips
Unexpected Nutritional Label Variances from Water Addition: Root Cause Analysis
Human Trafficking Policy Request from Supplier – What to Include?
Food Safety Policy Date – Should It Be Updated Annually Even If Unchanged?
Do Acrylic Doors in Bottling Lines Need to Be Monitored Under Glass and Brittle Plastic Policy?
Cell Phone and Glass Policy in Production Areas
Glass and Brittle Plastic Policy in a Beverage Plant
Request for locker & hand phone use policy in production area
Root Cause Analysis for Non-Conformities After BRCGS Audit
Nail Varnish Policy for Visitors: Is it Too Strict?