What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

Clause 4.9.2.1 - Do we need a daily checklist to control sharps?

Started by , Feb 27 2014 12:44 PM
3 Replies

In clause 4.9.2.1 we suppose to have sharp metal policy in place. Does this policy needs to be supported by a daily checklist to prove that all the tools are accountable or a general policy will work that out. Because we are not using any those tools at food contact surfaces, onle short knives are being used to open packaginds.

Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
FSSC 22000 V 5.1 Clause 2.5.12 PRP Verification Interpretation SQF Clause for Organic SOPs Does BRCGS Clause 3.11.4 Apply to Incidents Involving Products Excluded from Audit Scope? Incorporating Outsourced Suppliers into HACCP Risk Assessments: BRC Clause 3.5.4.3 Compliance Is a Written Procedure Required for Existing Products According to BRCGS Clause 5.1.1?
[Ad]

In clause 4.9.2.1 we suppose to have sharp metal policy in place. Does this policy needs to be supported by a daily checklist to prove that all the tools are accountable or a general policy will work that out. Because we are not using any those tools at food contact surfaces, onle short knives are being used to open packaginds.

4.9.2.1 where ??

 

Regardless the answer is yes to first part of second sentence. :smile:

 

Rgds / Charles.C

1 Thank

I think it's BRC Charles...

 

Have you taken a look ->here<- hsidhu

It's BRC;

 

4.9.2.1

"There shall be a documented policy for the control of the use of sharp metal implements
including knives, cutting blades on equipment, needles and wires. This shall include a record
of inspection for damage and the investigation of any lost items. Snap-off blade knives shall
not be used."

 

 

Here is another thread on the topic;

 

http://www.ifsqn.com...st-not-be-used/

 

And to answer your question, hsidhu, it may depend on the step in the process and what packaging are being opened and tools used.  The guidance is a bit vague with BRC so it would be best to avoid too much scrutiny and establish an edged utensil register and policy outlining procedures.


Similar Discussion Topics
FSSC 22000 V 5.1 Clause 2.5.12 PRP Verification Interpretation SQF Clause for Organic SOPs Does BRCGS Clause 3.11.4 Apply to Incidents Involving Products Excluded from Audit Scope? Incorporating Outsourced Suppliers into HACCP Risk Assessments: BRC Clause 3.5.4.3 Compliance Is a Written Procedure Required for Existing Products According to BRCGS Clause 5.1.1? Could you pleae help to explain clause 3.4.1 in BRCGS Food Safety Standard Issue 8? ISO 22000:2018 - Clause 4.3 SQF Clause 5.2.1 - Artwork customer approval BRCGS Storage and Distribution - Clause 1.1.9 BRCGS Clause 3.11.3 - Incident management test must include a recall test?