What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

Are paper labels considered low risk?

Started by , Jun 11 2015 02:47 PM
1 Reply

Are paper labels (sheet fed inks, coated 1 side 60# paper) considered low risk as a packaging material,... and therefore it is not necessary to provide GFSI certificates to provide to vendors?  Must be 3.5.1.2 in the BRC standard. 

Or as a subcontractor (providing the packaging material) is a printer required to be GFSI certified?  (3.5.4.2 in the BRC standard)

 

Thanks.

 

 

Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
Validity of Risk-Based Response by Zone for E. coli vs. Salmonella/Listeria in EMP PCQI 2.0, is it considered a HACCP class? Records: Paper or Electronic Risk assessment of clothing and hair policy Do non-food contact labels and film overwrap have to be covered when stored?
[Ad]

Hello Vetterwi, and welcome to the IFSQN.

If your packaging product does not come into direct contact with food then it would be considered low risk.  That said the BRC Standard for Packaging contains requirements for both low and high risk suppliers and if your packaging product is for example secondary packaging such as a label on a food product container then you should follow the low risk requirements...and still aim to achieve certification.

 

Regards,

Simon


Similar Discussion Topics
Validity of Risk-Based Response by Zone for E. coli vs. Salmonella/Listeria in EMP PCQI 2.0, is it considered a HACCP class? Records: Paper or Electronic Risk assessment of clothing and hair policy Do non-food contact labels and film overwrap have to be covered when stored? Transport risk assessment mapping BRC Non-Conformance: Are Ear Gauges Considered Prohibited Jewelry in Non-Food Handling Areas? How Should Metal Detection Be Scored in a Risk Assessment — High or Low Risk? Risk assessment and frequency of replacement of Protective clothing Reading List for Transition to Food Contact Labels