What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

3.9.1 - Samples for 3rd party analysis (Traceability)

Started by , Jan 07 2016 08:04 AM
1 Reply

Hi guys,

 

I badly needed help, I'm trying to understand this standard from BRC Version 7 which states that "Identification of raw materials, including primary and any other relevant packaging and finished products and materials pending investigation shall be adequate to ensure traceability."

 

So, i'm a bit confused of the underlined statement. Does it include third party analysis?

 

I'm trying to create a procedure wherein we will monitor the batch code of samples sent to third party analysis to ensure traceability.

 

Please, help me guys  :helpplease:

 

 

Thanks,

 

Joan

Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
Can Data Cutoff Dates Differ for Audits vs. Internal Analysis? Expired Inventory - setting a new assessment on positive microbial analysis and organoleptic inspection results Unexpected Nutritional Label Variances from Water Addition: Root Cause Analysis SQF 2.4.3.7 - Hazard Analysis Supplier Approval System for Third-Party Manufacturers of Own Brand Product
[Ad]

Hi Joan,

 

Double Post ?

 

http://www.ifsqn.com...ity/#entry96929

 

added -

 

IMO (I don’t have the BRC Interp. Guidelines) the word “investigation” is probably being used in a multi-purpose way, ie not specific.

 

For example consider this extract from a semi-review -

 

OBJECTIVES OF A FOOD TRACEABILITY SYSTEM 

 

There are two objectives of a food traceability system: 

 

1. To identify uniquely, a batch of food and the raw material batches used in its production, in a way which allows tracking the physical flow of the food forwards through the food chain to the immediate customer and tracing of the physical flow of raw materials backwards to the immediate supplier .

 

2. To create and maintain accurate traceability records that can be provided within a short time period for routine examination or investigation purposes at the demand of the competent authorities.

 

 

http://www.ifsqn.com...ise/#entry66072

 

So a process example might be where you have material on “hold” for investigation.  It must be traceable. If not done, here is a real example of the potential consequences –

 

http://www.ifsqn.com...ity/#entry92665

 

To express it conservatively,  portions of the process intermediates / raw materials / finished products /  samples / etc which are "floating around" should be traceable. Somehow.


Similar Discussion Topics
Can Data Cutoff Dates Differ for Audits vs. Internal Analysis? Expired Inventory - setting a new assessment on positive microbial analysis and organoleptic inspection results Unexpected Nutritional Label Variances from Water Addition: Root Cause Analysis SQF 2.4.3.7 - Hazard Analysis Supplier Approval System for Third-Party Manufacturers of Own Brand Product Do I Need a US Import Permit for Fermented Cocoa Bean Samples? CCP and Preventive Control in the same Hazard Analysis FSMA Final Rule on Requirements for Additional Traceability Records How to Score Severity and Likelihood for Raw Materials in Hazard Analysis How to Score Metal Detection CCP in Hazard Analysis: High or Low Risk?