What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

Air Extraction test pieces

Started by , Apr 26 2017 03:57 PM
2 Replies

Hi

 

I wondered if anyone has any experience or an idea about the use of test pieces for when you put wine glasses/cups/bottles under an air extractor to make sure there isnt anything within it, i.e. packaging tape, peices of plastic or dead spiders for example (hopefully not the last!) to prove its working efficiently. We have been challenged that we should have a standardised repeatable method. :doctor:

 

Thanks

 

Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
Microbiological Test Standard BRC Metal Detection - Correct Placing of Test Pieces What does SQF require one to test in the compressed air that has indirect contact with food? Test kit to verify that all sanitizer residues are completely removed BRCGS Clause 3.11.3 - Incident management test must include a recall test?
[Ad]

I wouldn't use a test piece, at least not routinely.  What I'd do is link up your extraction to a failure alert system, e.g. an alarm or ideally an alarm and a belt stop if the vacuum fails to draw above a certain limit.  I'd then do a routine check by switching off the vacuum or blocking the line in some way.

 

I suppose as a validation it's an option to put in a "test piece" of some kind but in reality what you want to suck out is likely to be small and vary considerably in density but as a validation you could find out what kind of contaminants your vacuum is likely to draw out.

 

If you do go down the route of having a test piece and providing you have metal detection later in the process, I would certainly make your test pieces metal detectable so you know you're not likely to then let them go with the product but I would say it's a procedure which is fraught with risk of contaminating the product (more risk than not testing it.)

1 Like

I wouldn't use a test piece, at least not routinely.  What I'd do is link up your extraction to a failure alert system, e.g. an alarm or ideally an alarm and a belt stop if the vacuum fails to draw above a certain limit.  I'd then do a routine check by switching off the vacuum or blocking the line in some way.

 

I suppose as a validation it's an option to put in a "test piece" of some kind but in reality what you want to suck out is likely to be small and vary considerably in density but as a validation you could find out what kind of contaminants your vacuum is likely to draw out.

 

If you do go down the route of having a test piece and providing you have metal detection later in the process, I would certainly make your test pieces metal detectable so you know you're not likely to then let them go with the product but I would say it's a procedure which is fraught with risk of contaminating the product (more risk than not testing it.)

Thanks GMO, ive never considered the vacuum presure being the trigger for this. Sadly no metal detection either on site so complicates things but atleast you have given me something to work with

 

Thanks again

J


Similar Discussion Topics
Microbiological Test Standard BRC Metal Detection - Correct Placing of Test Pieces What does SQF require one to test in the compressed air that has indirect contact with food? Test kit to verify that all sanitizer residues are completely removed BRCGS Clause 3.11.3 - Incident management test must include a recall test? If I change the Xray Silicon 4.0 test sample to 8.0 mm will there be any problems? PAA test strips not matching titration results Walnut test frequency Can we test the water used in our facility using water testing kits? Test for determining Milk Fat adulteration in the dairy Industry.