What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

What’s the difference between a vulnerability assessment and HACCP?

Started by , Sep 04 2018 08:28 PM
Hey Jean,

Your food defense is going to pretty much be covering only anything that occurs with someone trying to intentionally adulterate your product. You can use similiar strategies in your HACCP as long as they are showing that they apply to keeping the product safe from the hazards that are inherent in producing your packaging. After all, your HACCP, which is separate from your food defense plan, is there to identify and mitigate the chemical, biological, radiological and physical hazards from the envrionment and does not address specifically malicious intent from another organization or from an internal employee. Your best bet is to keep them separate unless they truly can translate from food defense to natural hazard control.

Cheers!
12 Replies

Hello folks, can someone please clarify my ideas. I'm confusing a little bit with this terms. what's the difference between a vulnerabilities assessment vs. the HACCP?

Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
High-Risk vs. High-Care Areas in BRC – What’s the Difference? Defining Long Shelf Life – What’s Considered ‘Long’ in Food Products? What’s New in BRCGS Global Standard Packaging Materials Issue 7? What’s the Best Way to Dispose of Burnt Bulbs? Auditor Certification- GFSI- What’s the best route to gain certification and what company?
[Ad]

Hello folks, can someone please clarify my ideas. I'm confusing a little bit with this terms. what's the difference between a vulnerabilities assessment vs. the HACCP?

 

Hi jean,

 

Go to this page -

 

http://foodfraud.msu...sessment-vaccp/

1 Thank

JeanC,

 

In simple terms vulnerability is for intentional contamination while HACCP for unintentional contamination.

 

In very simple example (note that this is not be related to your process), let say you are making sandwiches for later and you pull out the spreads (one peanut butter and one mayonnaise), you use 2 spoons separately, if on the handling on these implements there are some incidental  contacts then can be covered by HACCP. If in case for on this preparation, you take something from the fridge and someone deliberately use the spoon of mayonnaise for peanut butter then it may be covered by vulnerability assessment.

1 Thank

JeanC,

 

In simple terms vulnerability is for intentional contamination while HACCP for unintentional contamination.

 

In very simple example (note that this is not be related to your process), let say you are making sandwiches for later and you pull out the spreads (one peanut butter and one mayonnaise), you use 2 spoons separately, if on the handling on these implements there are some incidental  contacts then can be covered by HACCP. If in case for on this preparation, you take something from the fridge and someone deliberately use the spoon of mayonnaise for peanut butter then it may be covered by vulnerability assessment.

 

Hi 01,

 

Perhaps a litle over-simplified. The "economic" is a core factor also, despite the alleged, continuously associated, safety potential.

1 Thank

Thank you guys!

 A nice seminar on how to conduct an FFVA is offered by:

 

www.foodfraudadvisors.com

1 Thank

 A nice seminar on how to conduct an FFVA is offered by:

 

www.foodfraudadvisors.com

 

Appreciate it 

Hi jean,

 

Go to this page -

 

http://foodfraud.msu...sessment-vaccp/

 

Mr. Charles is it possible to use the Food Defense Mitigation Strategies as a part of the HACCP Measures to avoid hazards? We are a low-risk company that produces food contact packaging but we don't handle any food at our plant.

 

Thank you for sharing your knowledge, Jean.

Hey Jean,

Your food defense is going to pretty much be covering only anything that occurs with someone trying to intentionally adulterate your product. You can use similiar strategies in your HACCP as long as they are showing that they apply to keeping the product safe from the hazards that are inherent in producing your packaging. After all, your HACCP, which is separate from your food defense plan, is there to identify and mitigate the chemical, biological, radiological and physical hazards from the envrionment and does not address specifically malicious intent from another organization or from an internal employee. Your best bet is to keep them separate unless they truly can translate from food defense to natural hazard control.

Cheers!
1 Thank

Hey Jean,

Your food defense is going to pretty much be covering only anything that occurs with someone trying to intentionally adulterate your product. You can use similiar strategies in your HACCP as long as they are showing that they apply to keeping the product safe from the hazards that are inherent in producing your packaging. After all, your HACCP, which is separate from your food defense plan, is there to identify and mitigate the chemical, biological, radiological and physical hazards from the envrionment and does not address specifically malicious intent from another organization or from an internal employee. Your best bet is to keep them separate unless they truly can translate from food defense to natural hazard control.

Cheers!


You make it crystal clear, Awesome explanation, happy weekend!

Mr. Charles is it possible to use the Food Defense Mitigation Strategies as a part of the HACCP Measures to avoid hazards? We are a low-risk company that produces food contact packaging but we don't handle any food at our plant.

 

Thank you for sharing your knowledge, Jean.

 

Hi Jean,

 

As per previous post, the 2 items have fundamentally different bases, eg as in GFSI -

 

Food defense.png   108.88KB   2 downloads

A Food Defense Plan is NOT a food fraud vulnerability assessment (FFVA).

 

If you want to use a nice FREE tool for that and incorporate in your HACCP plan as per the requirements of GFSI-compliant food standards you can use SSAFE:

 

https://www.pwc.nl/e...fraud-tool.html

 

https://www.pwc.com/...cision-tree.pdf

1 Thank

A Food Defense Plan is NOT a food fraud vulnerability assessment (FFVA).

 

If you want to use a nice FREE tool for that and incorporate in your HACCP plan as per the requirements of GFSI-compliant food standards you can use SSAFE:

 

https://www.pwc.nl/e...fraud-tool.html

 

https://www.pwc.com/...cision-tree.pdf

 

Hi livanezos,

 

Thanks for the input.

 

Actually this tool has been discussed here many, many times. Some like it, some not.

 

IMO "nice" depends on yr level of Patience over 40 + questions, particularly when the excel's macro refuses to give a report at the end. :smile:

 

But I agree some people recommend it.


Similar Discussion Topics
High-Risk vs. High-Care Areas in BRC – What’s the Difference? Defining Long Shelf Life – What’s Considered ‘Long’ in Food Products? What’s New in BRCGS Global Standard Packaging Materials Issue 7? What’s the Best Way to Dispose of Burnt Bulbs? Auditor Certification- GFSI- What’s the best route to gain certification and what company? What’s Really in Your Food What’s Really in Your Food What’s Really in Your Food What’s FDA's definition for storing and holding of seafood? Organic vs. Non-Organic: What’s the Difference?