What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

On-site supplier audit

Started by , Oct 03 2018 11:13 PM
3 Replies

Can someone give me some clarity on the on-site audits for FSMA as far as: is this needed for all supplier that are high risk? I am only asking because we manufacture cheese and most ingredient if not all ingredients are added after milk is pasteurized. So will that mean all my ingredients added will be considered high risk because we are not longer taking care of the hazard and we are having the supplier control the hazard?. Will a 3rd party audit fulfill this requirement? If not what exactly needs to be included in this on-site audit?

 

We are SQF certified and we required all supplier to go thorough a supplier approval process, but looking into FSMA this approval process now requires on-sites audits. If I am wrong please let me know.

 

Thanks for any help :)

Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
How many Non-conformances did you get at your last audit? Allergen checklist to supplier Shadow Witness Audit Request First time Costco audit, no GFSI certification Help with ISCC EU Audit
[Ad]

Hi, ffkm.

 

From what I understand, this based on the risk you have assessed for the material (if the material is with significant hazard or not). Case in point, I'll be using microbiological hazard as an example.

 

Since you adding materials after pasteurization of milk then you may have a high risk process (depending on your HACCP and other PRPs you have in place). However, this does not mean necessarily that you have high risk materials.

 

If for example, I have cheese to which my ingredients are milk which is being pasteurized, salt and culture or whey powder added after pasteurization.

 

From most of the literature you may see that for your product (speaking only of pathogen of interest), you will see that culture and whey powder may have high risk for listeria and salmonella thus it is high risk material and may have significant hazard. As for salt, it is low risk thus may not be significant hazard for your process/product (based on your HACCP).

 

from this you could derive your supplier program. You may audit more frequent whey and culture. From what I also understand,  3rd party audits.

 

As for the supplier program, it is not limited to audit, food safety testing can also be used.

1 Like1 Thank

Hello,

 

In addition to the very useful information given above, please also consider your own process while carrying out the ingredients risk assessment.

 

That means, for example, that if you are sieving or filtering the ingredients before dosing, you are taking away the foreign body risk of these ingredients. The same is valid, if you carry out a metal detection or an X-ray inspection on the finished product.

 

If you're not doing this yet, you can consider it, to lower the risk of your raw materials.

 

And last but not least, include all food hazards in your ingredients risk assessment.

 

Kind regards,

 

Gerard Heerkens

Hi ffkmm,

 

Not sure where in the FSMA final rule you found a requirement for on-site audits with the exception of verification of foreign suppliers. Other controls include the above with a proper hazard analysis of the ingredient and appropriate verification that those hazards are controlled, either through supplier requirements or your own analysis of incoming materials.


Similar Discussion Topics
How many Non-conformances did you get at your last audit? Allergen checklist to supplier Shadow Witness Audit Request First time Costco audit, no GFSI certification Help with ISCC EU Audit BRC Quarterly Audit coverage Third party audit certificate redacted Huge bill for unannounced BRC Audit Expenses FSSC V6 Internal audit Checklist BRCGS 3.7.2 - Does a supplier have to have a HARA/HACCP to be an approved supplier through a questionnaire?