What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

When is it necessary to perform Risk Assessments?

Started by , Dec 08 2018 07:36 PM
2 Replies

When is it necessary to perform a risk assessment/analysis?

How are these done and what kind of questions are needed to ensure the assessment is being completed accurately?

 

I am being told from a sister plant that we should perform risk assessments for our trash compactor being near production and drains being in our aisle ways. But I am just a little confused on why we need to perform a risk analysis if SQF does not require me to do it.

 

We are a flexible packaging manufacturer.

 

Any insights would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
Supplier Risk Assessment HARA same as risk assessment for ISO? Looking for Management of Change Procedure and Risk Template Is Raw Milk Safe for Consumption? Risk, Regulations & Recalls Assessment for Production Risk Zones based on Clause 4.3.1 of BRC Issue 9
[Ad]

(a) When is it necessary to perform a risk assessment/analysis?

(b) How are these done and what kind of questions are needed to ensure the assessment is being completed accurately?

The answers to (a,b) will depend on the specific risk assessment  ?

If you mean the (haccp) assessment of a risk due to a hazard, it is conventional to express the risk as the product of the likelihood of occurrence of the hazard and the severity of its consequence if it actually occurs, ie R = LxS (Sometimes R = L + S but this is less commonly used in food haccp)

The detailed methodology is available in standard  haccp textbooks / IT.

 

I am being told from a sister plant that we should perform risk assessments for our trash compactor being near production and drains being in our aisle ways. But I am just a little confused on why we need to perform a risk analysis if SQF does not require me to do it.

I assume the packaging is for food use.

The RA objective is presumably to evaluate the risk due to a hazard of cross-contamination.

 

We are a flexible packaging manufacturer.

 

Any insights would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

 

 

Hi Julie,

 

See ^^^^

 

If need expansion/clarification  of any of the above please inform.

 

There is an unfortunate  tendency these days for people to ask for RAs for everything under the sun. Semi-Generic RA Procedures (= "Risk-based") for certain applications, eg hygiene PRPs have been posted here.

1 Thank

Where in SQF does it state that you don't have to do a risk analysis on certain things?

 

Your risk analysis should consider all possible sources of contamination (materials, machines, building, people, internal environment, external environment, etc.).

Per above, for your trash compactor:  Likelihood = 1 (almost no chance of contamination happening) and Severity = 1 (not severe even if it happens)

LxS = 1x1 = 1 (Low Risk) = justification for why you don't need a control program.

 

You will need to show your auditor that you have adequately addressed all possible risks and implemented any necessary control programs to mitigate the risk.


Similar Discussion Topics
Supplier Risk Assessment HARA same as risk assessment for ISO? Looking for Management of Change Procedure and Risk Template Is Raw Milk Safe for Consumption? Risk, Regulations & Recalls Assessment for Production Risk Zones based on Clause 4.3.1 of BRC Issue 9 Lessons from the Martinelli Case: Importance of Supplier Risk Controls Climate Change Risk Assessment for FSSC 22000 Packaging Producers Cannery Risk Zoning Guidance for New Canning Facility Mitigating Risk During Loading/Unloading Without a Dock – SQF Compliance Patulin risk assessment