Does anyone have a Metal Detection Deviation form to share?

Hello and good morning everyone, 

Does anyone have any Metal Detection Deviation forms they'd like to share?

Critical Control Point for our firm.

Thank you :)

Hello and good morning everyone, 

 

Does anyone have any Metal Detection Deviation forms they'd like to share?

 

Critical Control Point for our firm.

 

Thank you :)

Hi quality,

Perhaps you could explain what you mean by MDDF ?

Hi, quality06;

You should use a multipurpose record for such reports, for example.

Non-conformance Report.docx   16.76KB   247 downloads

You could also instruct personnel to use the record of monitoring/verification to document deviations. If the back of the form is blank, simply make it two-sided with specific fields to complete.

If you mean a Metal Detecting Log, here is ours. It includes a y/n column that indicates a deviation. I made the form as simple as possible, with as little writing as possible. Our runs are very short, so I did not include a "Middle" of run row.

Our BRC auditor told use to include a few blank Corrective Action Forms in the Metal Detecting Log binder the floor guys have. There is no separate form for writing up metal detection deviations.

Thanks guys!

I reviewed both of the PDFs. I do have a basic corrective action template, I was not aware I could use this same template for metal detection deviation. We were using a bit more of a complicated deviation form.

We have not had a BRC audit so I am glad to hear we can use a simple corrective action!

Whew,

Here is what we use.

Marshall

This is what I use. 

As you can see deviation was a bit more complicated. 

This is what I use. 

As you can see deviation was a bit more complicated. 

Thanks for Interesting Collection of Examples.

Responses seem to include (a) NUOCAs/Corrective Action Forms, (b) test piece monitoring Forms, (c) Hybrids

(1) None of the Monitoring forms/Monitoring segments seem to have a specific monitoring location/column for recording an actual rejection of Product !.

Surely this is an inadequate interpretation of a "Deviation" ?

(2) Could not see any "(a)" references to "Root Cause" Analyses  (thought this was mandatory for BRC ?)

PS - I think the operative using 1st form in Post 8 needs to be a follower of Sherlock Holmes ! :smile:

PPS - The hybrid versions look a little "overloaded" to me.

Charles,

In my case there is no place to put "actual" rejection of product (if any) because that is contained on another log.

The form is simply there to record why a metal detector check failed, or was not done in the time frame required by our SOP.

What was done to get the CCP back in control and how any product placed on hold due to the failure of the MD was handled.

Marshall

Charles,

 

In my case there is no place to put "actual" rejection of product (if any) because that is contained on another log.

 

The form is simply there to record why a metal detector check failed, or was not done in the time frame required by our SOP.

What was done to get the CCP back in control and how any product placed on hold due to the failure of the MD was handled.

 

Marshall

Hi Marshall,

Yes, I appreciate the intention but it seems illogical to not include rejects in a MD Monitoring Form. It also relates to definition of "Deviation".

I actually do record rejects on the actual MD monitoring form. But that's not what the Deviation form is.

Marshall

I actually do record rejects on the actual MD monitoring form. But that's not what the Deviation form is.

 

Marshall

Yes, I suspect it's just another US invention.

I simply have one form similar to Post8(B) Monitoring Form but with an extra column.