Environmental Monitoring Program for Spice Industry
Hello Everyone,
I need some guidance in the Spice Industry. Can someone share an example of a EMP?
I am new to this spice facility and industry and I am working in upgrading the EMP Program. The procedure does not have enough to pass SQF or FSMA
Looking for what kind of practices you do perform for your EMP. eg. Scheduling, micro monitoring, Zone Identification.
Thank you in advance.
Kellio.
Here's something I wrote for a spice company a while back. It has been superseded, and it should have been, as it has issues. But it should actually give you a better idea of the thinking processes one should go through--ideas that should probably not be shared so directly with employees and auditors.
Attached Files
Hello Mr Hank Major,
Thank you for your response. This is great information.
Kellio
Hello Mr Hank Major,
Thank you for your response. This is great information.
Kellio
No prob.
I look forward to seeing other people's Environmental Monitoring Program write-ups.
Hi kellio,
some examples here -
http://www.ifsqn.com...ls/#entry100060
http://www.ifsqn.com...am/#entry119334
PS - @Hank, Zone 1 seems to often not be routinely sampled for Salmonella.
Hello Charles,
Thank you very much for your information is very helpful. The Spice Industry have their own world and apparently it seems that the rules do not apply to them :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2:
Kellio
Hi kellio,
some examples here -
http://www.ifsqn.com...ls/#entry100060
http://www.ifsqn.com...am/#entry119334
PS - @Hank, Zone 1 seems to often not be routinely sampled for Salmonella.
That's correct, because we determined that such testing would be worse than useless. The Salmonella, if it exists, will be in the ingredients. We have COAs for all the ingredients.
That's correct, because we determined that such testing would be worse than useless. The Salmonella, if it exists, will be in the ingredients. We have COAs for all the ingredients.
Hi Hank, the 3 refs I checked seemed to imply that a positive result in zone 1 would almost certainly initiate a major incident. Hence no news was better than bad news. Strange logic I know.
Hi Hank, the 3 refs I checked seemed to imply that a positive result in zone 1 would almost certainly initiate a major incident. Hence no news was better than bad news. Strange logic I know.
Salmonella is a special concern because it can survive essentially forever in dry ingredients. That's why it is better to assume it is always present in the raw materials, prior to treatment.
Salmonella is a special concern because it can survive essentially forever in dry ingredients. That's why it is better to assume it is always present in the raw materials, prior to treatment.
Hi Hank,
Actually I had noted that yr previous attachment "seemed" to imply doing Salmonella sampling in Zone 1 (text is slightly ambiguous).
In truth, this one specific topic has generated a vast amount of discussion in the Literature (scientific and pragmatic) regarding the making of an appropriate Yes/No decision.
I enclose an extract illustrating the scope of possible determining factors .-
zone 1 sampling.PNG 662.6KB 13 downloads
Hi Hank,
Actually I had noted that yr previous attachment "seemed" to imply doing Salmonella sampling in Zone 1 (text is slightly ambiguous).
In truth, this one specific topic has generated a vast amount of discussion in the Literature (scientific and pragmatic) regarding the making of an appropriate Yes/No decision.
I enclose an extract illustrating the scope of possible determining factors .-
Yep, not a single one of those reasons to test in Zone 1 applies to my client's process.