What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

Section 4.8 of BRC Agents and Brokers

Started by , Oct 16 2019 07:20 PM
2 Replies

Hi Everyone, 

 

Can someone please provide some information for the following?

 

Section 4.8.1 --> What are examples of processes that are in place to access information that may present a risk of adulteration?

 

Section 4.8.2 --> How do accesses the likelihood for each product to be vulnerable for adulteration? What kind of routine testing could you implement as a supplier?

 

Section 4.8.3 --> can the mitigation plan include documents or preventive controls used to prevent fraudulent acts?

Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
BRCGS Section 4.6 risk assessments for version 9 Section 11.7.5.7 - Knife Control of Box Cutters Does primary conversion section 5.9 of BRCGS Version 9 apply to lobsters? BRC Section 4.5.3 Air BRCGS Section 5.9 - Animal Primary Conversion
[Ad]

Section 4.8.1 --> What are examples of processes that are in place to access information that may present a risk of adulteration? supplier approval and monitoring is just one example.

You could also set up yourself or designate to have alerts set up for CFIA, FDA recalls.

you could also refer to https://www.usp.org/...rence-materials

https://trello.com/b...isk-information

 

 

Section 4.8.2 --> How do accesses the likelihood for each product to be vulnerable for adulteration? What kind of routine testing could you implement as a supplier?

My current company is an importer distributer of finished packaged goods so risk is low but depending on the nature of your product, type of product, availability(economic factors), nature of the product(solid, liquid, powder), historical evidence of adulteration from news sources, regulatory alerts,, recalls, end user and so on, are just some criteria to go by. e,g infant formula is higher risk due to all these factors.

 

Section 4.8.3 --> can the mitigation plan include documents or preventive controls used to prevent fraudulent acts?

I have added supplier approval and monitoring procedure as a preventive control. source material only from suppliers on the approved supplier list and approve suppliers based on relationship, GFSI recognized scheme, audit reports, self audits, COAs, specs and/or letter of guarantee.

 

Hope this helps

This section of the standard is pretty much copied from the BRC food standard, and there are mountains of resources out there for that - you can use pretty much all of them as the standards are so similar in this area (I run the same system across our Food and A&B certification/activities).

As a starting point, the attached guide from BRC is worth a read.

The below are also some examples of thread from IFSQN, each of which contains various useful links, and there are many more - the search box towards the top right of the page will bring up loads of information.

 

https://www.ifsqn.co...itigation-plan/

https://www.ifsqn.co...ity-assessment/

https://www.ifsqn.co...sment-template/

https://www.ifsqn.co...se/#entry116201

 

In terms of your specific questions:

 

4.8.1 - the threads above have some links. Trello, RASFF etc are popular free resources. If you're a member of an industry body then try also contacting them as they may monitor things of particular reference to your industry.

 

4.8.2 - you'll need to do a vulnerability assessment. Have a read of the BRC guide that I've attached. The feasibility, nature, and relevance of testing will very much depend on the types of products that you handle. e.g. probably not that relevant for whole fresh fruit. If you can provide detail on the product range in question then we may be able to make more specific suggestions, but again it's possibly also worth talking to an industry body in your sector as they'll likely have lots of detail on this.

 

4.8.3 - yes, this can include preventative controls and documents, but they'll obviously need to be relevant within the context of the product, type of risk, and level of risk. The interpretation guide actually specifically states that it is preferable to use proactive controls rather than reactive measures such as testing. (If you've not yet got a copy, it's worth getting the interpretation guide - available free if you're on Participate, but worth buying if not).

Attached Files


Similar Discussion Topics
BRCGS Section 4.6 risk assessments for version 9 Section 11.7.5.7 - Knife Control of Box Cutters Does primary conversion section 5.9 of BRCGS Version 9 apply to lobsters? BRC Section 4.5.3 Air BRCGS Section 5.9 - Animal Primary Conversion BRCSGS section 1.1.2 Food Safety Culture TS 22002-1 Section 8 Equipment suitability, cleaning and maintenance How are companies approaching Section 2.3.2 (Specifications) in SQF Code 9.0 S&D V4 Section 5.2.7 Waste Containers not in compliance with section 54 of the SFCR