Does a non-retail product require a Prop 65 warning on our labeling?
Started by QA_Spices, Nov 21 2019 08:56 PM
For whole sale of a product that is more likely to be repacked and/or used as an ingredient for a product to be sold retail in CA. Do we need to use the Prop 65 warning on our labeling? We are in NM.
New Product Development
New Product Development
Fresh Product Supplier
labeling and fortification under FDA
RASFF 2024 Overview: Top Product Groups and Hazards
[Ad]
If you are selling / distributing product into California and you have an ingredient that is on the Prop 65 list above the threshold level then yes according to the regulation.
Now...in practicality maybe not; ask the coffee companies who sell & distribute in California because of trace amounts of acrylamide.
New Product Development
New Product Development
Fresh Product Supplier
labeling and fortification under FDA
RASFF 2024 Overview: Top Product Groups and Hazards
No mock recall conducted with reworked product
Where to Find Section 403(i)(2) of the FD&C Act and How It Relates to Labeling Requirements
What Happens When You Remove Product Lines from Your BRC Scope?
Supplier Approval System for Third-Party Manufacturers of Own Brand Product
Date Coding Inner Pouches vs. Retail Boxes: Compliance with Labeling Laws