What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

Food Defence Methodology for determining significant hazards

Started by , Nov 12 2020 09:50 AM
2 Replies

Good Day Food Safety Members. I am needing assistance regarding TACCP, I used the following tool (as per attached)  and the auditor gave a finding for not determining significant threats. And further to that a finding on the SOP  - "'The methodology for determining significant threats was not clear on the tool used. Any good ideas how I can close out this finding. I would really appreciate some urgent assistance. Best Regards

 

 

Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
Lubricants oil - Food grade or not? Guidance on Using "Clean Label" for Imported Food Products Food Defense FSA Announces Additional Investigatory Powers to Tackle Food Fraud Accidental Ingredient Addition: Food Fraud or Not?
[Ad]

Kelpack this is what helped me to complete the Food Defense plan with the proper VA.

 

https://www.ifsh.iit..._2019 04 15.pdf

 

Lesson 8 in page 8.1.

 

Good luck.

Good Day Food Safety Members. I am needing assistance regarding TACCP, I used the following tool (as per attached)  and the auditor gave a finding for not determining significant threats. And further to that a finding on the SOP  - "'The methodology for determining significant threats was not clear on the tool used. Any good ideas how I can close out this finding. I would really appreciate some urgent assistance. Best Regards

^^^^ No attachment.


Similar Discussion Topics
Lubricants oil - Food grade or not? Guidance on Using "Clean Label" for Imported Food Products Food Defense FSA Announces Additional Investigatory Powers to Tackle Food Fraud Accidental Ingredient Addition: Food Fraud or Not? Correct SQF Edition for Food Packaging Compliance Are Private Food Safety Certifications Truly Beneficial? Where Can I Find Basic Spanish Food Safety Training Resources? Template Request for Food Safety Culture Survey Hello from a food safety passionate!