What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

Which FSSC 22000 points require KPIs?

Started by , Sep 20 2021 12:17 PM
4 Replies

Hi guys :)

 

Could you please help and suggested what can be  supporting PI’s to meet the high level KPI’s on foreign bodies/quality as measured by complaints?

 

Which FSSC point exactly requires such PIs?

 

Thanks in advance 

Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
FSSC 22000 v6 – Must Suppliers Be Certified? Impact of ISO 22002-100:2025 on FSSC V6 Documentation Requirements Can anybody share an FSSC Internal Audit Checklist? New ISO 22002 series by May 2025-New ISO 22000 revision expected early 2027 Is Scientific Literature Enough for ISO 22000 Validation, or Is Practical Testing Required?
[Ad]

KPIs relate to section 9 Performance Evaluation - however, the standard itself does not actually require KPIs as far as I see (refer to ISO 22000:2018). Supporting activities could be your internal audits, GMP inspections, trainings, etc.: the less non-conformities/deviations you have in terms of foreign matter control, the higher your KPI.

Hi olenazh,
I try to write manual, processes and documents for a site that want fssc22000.
When i try to interpretent the requirement of 6.2 objectives I write the below mentioned document. but then I came across with the requirement 9.1!!!
WTF??? is this the same? I used to work with BRC and FSSC/ISO standard confuse me so much!
If you can make clear to me what every clause wants with one example I would be grateful.

sorry this is the file

Attached Files

Hello.
 
Although it is true that, in ISO 22000 standard, it does not define at which points PI´s should be established, it is very practical to establish them based on verification activities.
ISO 22000 clause 8.8, where the verification plan must be established with the verification activities, methods, frequencies, responsible parties, monitoring and measurement will be directly developed, that is, in the PRPs, or according to the verification activities and methods. They are going to propose indicators (not only of compliance, but also of performance), which would contribute to the Objective. (Clause 9.1.1 y 9.1.2)
 
Depending on the PPR x eg,
cross contamination prevention: (ISO 7TS 22002-1 clause 10),
method: physical state inspections of luminaires, glass, acrylic, ceramic,
frequency: every quarterly, indicators can be generated:
1- compliance (compliance with the inspection plan by review area of ​​the physical state of luminaires, glass, acrylic, ceramic)
2- performance: index of presence of foreign materials in the product, or on the line, by areas. ( downward trend).
 
That is, in ISO 22000 in 8.8 the method is established, in 9.11 I establish How (indicator) and when to measure according to results obtained in 8.8, and in 9.1.2 I analyze and evaluate information, trends are verified, which confirm that 8.8 is met and contributes to objectives.

Similar Discussion Topics
FSSC 22000 v6 – Must Suppliers Be Certified? Impact of ISO 22002-100:2025 on FSSC V6 Documentation Requirements Can anybody share an FSSC Internal Audit Checklist? New ISO 22002 series by May 2025-New ISO 22000 revision expected early 2027 Is Scientific Literature Enough for ISO 22000 Validation, or Is Practical Testing Required? Requesting Educational Materials on FSSC 22000 Certification Does a Change in the Flow Diagram Require EMP Review? FSSC V6 Internal audit Checklist Do oPRPs Still Provide Value Under FSMA and FSSC? Climate Change Risk Assessment for FSSC 22000 Packaging Producers