What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

Is anyone aware of a legal or regulatory definition of the food claim term 'simple'?

Started by , Aug 12 2022 05:58 PM
6 Replies

Hi all, 

Is anyone aware of a legal or regulatory definition of the term "simple"?  Our Marketing group would like to use the term on our confectionery products.  We already rejected the term "simple ingredients". 

I haven't been able to find a definition from FDA so I assume that this falls under the "truthful" and "not misleading" labeling clause.  I also assume that the definition might have to come from litigation or legal precedent.

Any guidance on how I can justify (or not) the use of the term?

Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
ISO 22002 2025 Change Summary - Food Manufacturing Why do you have a food safety culture plan? Do non-food contact labels and film overwrap have to be covered when stored? Fragrance-Free Laundry Chemicals for Food Production Sites Clarifying AAFCO “Natural” Definition for Microbial Ingredients
[Ad]

Hi Jim La,

 

Perhaps some of the FDA links below can help you in your search. These sorts of questions can get complicated with the FDA (as you already know). I can't find anything on the FDA's regulation of the term "simple" either. Indeed, they're only just starting to define any boundaries to the term "natural". I think the best way your company could go about this is to understand how others are using the term "simple" in label claims, and create a definition for your firm that is backed by its current use in the industry. Although the FDA doesn't have formal regulations for it, that won't stop them from asking a few questions about your label on the next inspection. It's best to have some evidence prepared.

 

https://www.fda.gov/...ary-supplements

https://www.fda.gov/...ary-supplements

 

I'd be curious to hear what experience others on the forum have with this term.

1 Thank

I agree, Brothbro.  My aim to is do just that, put down on paper a justification for its use, if we decide to use it.  I will likely have to use legal precedent or, as you mentioned, something that is backed by current use.  I just haven't found that yet!  I understand that what we use might be tenuous and subject to critique.

Hi all, 

Is anyone aware of a legal or regulatory definition of the term "simple"?  Our Marketing group would like to use the term on our confectionery products.  We already rejected the term "simple ingredients". 

I haven't been able to find a definition from FDA so I assume that this falls under the "truthful" and "not misleading" labeling clause.  I also assume that the definition might have to come from litigation or legal precedent.

Any guidance on how I can justify (or not) the use of the term?

 

"simple" is not regulated per se, however if it is applied (implied) to "health", "nutritional", "dietary", "comparative product" labeling claims, it would be considered misleading. 

 

Work with your regional FDA liaison field officer. Believe it or not, they are quite helpful. 

Hi all, 

Is anyone aware of a legal or regulatory definition of the term "simple"?  Our Marketing group would like to use the term on our confectionery products.  We already rejected the term "simple ingredients". 

I haven't been able to find a definition from FDA so I assume that this falls under the "truthful" and "not misleading" labeling clause.  I also assume that the definition might have to come from litigation or legal precedent.

Any guidance on how I can justify (or not) the use of the term?

Hi Jim La,

 

A "simple" query - What is your "simple" intended to infer ?

 

I have never encountered this terminology although Google comments that "simple" sugars and "simple" carbohydrates apparently exist.

More unleading than misleading. :smile:

If you use that term your problem won't be with the FDA or other regulatory body since there is no formal definition for "simple" as a general term.

 

However, you may end up fending off lawsuits depending on how many predatory lawyers are out there looking for this.  It is amazing how much predatory lawyers has grown in the food industry over labeling.  I'm glad our company staffs multiple lawyers to help combat this and other support as well.

"simple" is not regulated per se, however if it is applied (implied) to "health", "nutritional", "dietary", "comparative product" labeling claims, it would be considered misleading. 

 

Work with your regional FDA liaison field officer. Believe it or not, they are quite helpful. 

 

Slab is right here. If the term simple is in any way intended to refer to claims about health, nutrition, diet or product comparison, auditors and authorities would likely consider your use misleading. What is your use of the term supposed to achieve?

 

Maybe there are better ways that are already working in the industry that we can share once we know the details.


Similar Discussion Topics
ISO 22002 2025 Change Summary - Food Manufacturing Why do you have a food safety culture plan? Do non-food contact labels and film overwrap have to be covered when stored? Fragrance-Free Laundry Chemicals for Food Production Sites Clarifying AAFCO “Natural” Definition for Microbial Ingredients Producing Pet Treats in a Human Food Facility – Regulatory Requirements Shortage of Skilled Technical Staff in the Food Industry Fellow Consultants – What’s Your Smartest Food Safety Hack? Ensuring Compliance with IFS Food Standards: Tips and Best Practices Food Safety Tips for Small Businesses: What to Prioritize?