What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

USP 61 - Interpretation of the Results

Started by , Oct 20 2022 12:59 PM
1 Reply

While looking at USP 61, Microbiological Examination of Nonsterile Products: Microbial Enumeration Tests, the Interpretation of the Results section. It states the following:

 

When an acceptance criterion for microbiological quality is prescribed, it is interpreted as follows:
 
101 cfu: maximum acceptable count = 20;
102 cfu: maximum acceptable count = 200;
103 cfu: maximum acceptable count = 2000;
 
and so forth.
 
How is 101 CFU maximum acceptable count interpreted as 20? Shouldn't it be 10? The same goes for 102 and 103. Shouldn't they be 100 and 1,000?
 
Thank you in advance.
 
Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
How close do proficiency testing results need to be for water activity and moisture percentage? In-House Gluten Testing – Do COA Results Require Validation? Random high TVC results in otherwise clear micro tests? Polands RASFF Rejections for Sunflower Oil – Misinterpretation of Analytical Results? How should I interpret coliform test results from a 250mL water sample, considering a 1mL transfer to a Hygiena MicroSnap test?
[Ad]

 

While looking at USP 61, Microbiological Examination of Nonsterile Products: Microbial Enumeration Tests, the Interpretation of the Results section. It states the following:

 

When an acceptance criterion for microbiological quality is prescribed, it is interpreted as follows:
 
101 cfu: maximum acceptable count = 20;
102 cfu: maximum acceptable count = 200;
103 cfu: maximum acceptable count = 2000;
 
and so forth.
 
How is 101 CFU maximum acceptable count interpreted as 20? Shouldn't it be 10? The same goes for 102 and 103. Shouldn't they be 100 and 1,000?
 
Thank you in advance.

 

Hi RFL,

 

The answer (if any) likely relates to the context of the data quoted which is unfortunately unknown.

 

Offhand, I note the word "interpreted" which can have a zillion meanings. :smile:


Similar Discussion Topics
How close do proficiency testing results need to be for water activity and moisture percentage? In-House Gluten Testing – Do COA Results Require Validation? Random high TVC results in otherwise clear micro tests? Polands RASFF Rejections for Sunflower Oil – Misinterpretation of Analytical Results? How should I interpret coliform test results from a 250mL water sample, considering a 1mL transfer to a Hygiena MicroSnap test? Handling <10 cfu/mL Results for Statistical Analysis Are City Water Analysis Results Sufficient for E. Coli Testing Compliance? FSSC 22000 V 5.1 Clause 2.5.12 PRP Verification Interpretation Interpreting ComBase results SSAFE Risk Assessment Tool (Report Interpretation)