What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

Why are bugs that come in a received ingredient a spec issue and not a food safety issue?

Started by , Sep 06 2023 02:59 PM
6 Replies

I am hoping to find out why bugs in a received ingredient would be a spec issue rather than classified as food safety issue.

Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
What’s the hardest part of building a strong food safety culture? New ISO 22002 Changes for Food Packaging Manufacturers Allowable Food Ingredients in Saudi Arabia BRC Non-Conformance: Are Ear Gauges Considered Prohibited Jewelry in Non-Food Handling Areas? ISO 22002 2025 Change Summary - Food Manufacturing
[Ad]

This may not be the answer you want to hear, but for me:   Because the FDA says so. 

If the FDA said otherwise, I'd react otherwise.   We're a dry mix manufacturer so bugs are a common worry and we spend a lot of time cleaning to ensure we have no bugs in here, and anything that arrived here with bugs will be rejected, thrown out immediately, etc.

1 Thank

From the FDA website: The FDA set these action levels because it is economically impractical to grow, harvest, or process raw products that are totally free of non-hazardous, naturally occurring, unavoidable defects. Products harmful to consumers are subject to regulatory action whether or not they exceed the action levels."

 

The FDA does put a limit on them. 

https://www.fda.gov/...levels-handbook

Probably has something to do with the FDA providing an acceptable level of bug parts per sample size in many, many ingredients.  Hell, they have acceptable levels of mammal droppings for many of the foods too.

 

Food Defect Levels Handbook | FDA

 

The food safety issue regarding insects is their ability to transport bacteria into goods.  Some plants will defend certain levels of insects in their product depending on whether its RTE/NRTE status.  "Weevils in your raw flour?  Meh, sift them out, you're going to bake something with the flour and the baking provides sufficient kill temps."  Not an attitude I love, personally, but it is out there.

Strange thread to a non-USA reader.

 

Is there a FDA definition/interpretation of "bug" ? (Partially answered by Post 4).

 

My instinctive thought on reading the OP was that surely it depends on what "bug" is being referred to ?

 

I would have also thought that the issue may overlap the notorious (US) topic of "adulteration" ?

Health Canada also has a list of "unavoidable" contaminates available upon request

 

https://www.canada.c...al-methods.html

Probably has something to do with the FDA providing an acceptable level of bug parts per sample size in many, many ingredients.  Hell, they have acceptable levels of mammal droppings for many of the foods too.

 

Food Defect Levels Handbook | FDA

 

The food safety issue regarding insects is their ability to transport bacteria into goods.  Some plants will defend certain levels of insects in their product depending on whether its RTE/NRTE status.  "Weevils in your raw flour?  Meh, sift them out, you're going to bake something with the flour and the baking provides sufficient kill temps."  Not an attitude I love, personally, but it is out there.

Stop it, you're making me hungry.....lol.


Similar Discussion Topics
What’s the hardest part of building a strong food safety culture? New ISO 22002 Changes for Food Packaging Manufacturers Allowable Food Ingredients in Saudi Arabia BRC Non-Conformance: Are Ear Gauges Considered Prohibited Jewelry in Non-Food Handling Areas? ISO 22002 2025 Change Summary - Food Manufacturing How to Prevent Physical Contamination in Food Production Is GFSI Reconsidering the Food Science Degree Requirement for Auditors? Restricting access to a small sanitation chemical dispenser/station to comply with food defense What is your Food Safety Consultant Charging? Why do you have a food safety culture plan?