What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

Primary Packaging vs Secondary Packaging

Started by , Oct 17 2024 09:49 PM
5 Replies

Hi Guys

 

Can someone please shed some light on this if they can. We got audited and got a CAR for using a supplier who isn't GFSI accredited (they only have ISO). Now this supplier only supplies us egg trays/fillers (different names around the world).

 

I was under the impression that it's not necessary a direct contact as egg is still in a shell therefore it wouldn't be that critical to have a more stringent food certification compared to say a vacuum pack bag/liner which directly contacts a meat product. Can someone brief me on how to go about explaining this to an auditor as i don't think our supplier will be willing to get a Gfsi accreditation such as BRC, fssc or sqf at this stage just for us. We have done all the risk assessments & the likelihood of any contamination (micro, phyical, chemical, allergen) has been deemed as low.

Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
Is Primary Packaging Storage an Enclosed Product Area Under BRCGS Issue 9? Shelf Life of Primary Packaging What supplier documentation is required when using Aluminium Foil as Primary Packaging? Does primary conversion section 5.9 of BRCGS Version 9 apply to lobsters? BRCGS Section 5.9 - Animal Primary Conversion
[Ad]

What standard were you audited under and did the supplier in question qualify per your own supplier approval policy/program?

 

Did the supplier provide you with a copy of their non GFSI Audit?

We were audited against the Coles Standard (Australian standard) which pretty much rivals some of the best GFSI standards. When we did our own supplier approval process on this supplier, we deemed them to be ok to use after having done all necessary risk assessments.

 

They only have ISO 9001 accreditation

Hi! Is in the Coles standard a requirement stating all the primary packaging suppliers should be GFSI certified? If not, is it in your buying procedure? If both of these are no then there should be no reason for a NC in my opinion.

 

A supplier audit by your company could maybe work if documented right in your internal procedures. 

 

We have stated that primary packaging is everything a consumer takes to their house when its bought.

As a customer audit, what code or requirement did they cite for the non compliance?  Specific wording.

 

Some times it doesn't matter if it makes sense, if their code says X, that's what you do.  Unless you get an exemption in writing.

Hi sean_as,

 

Egg shells are porous/permeable, so the packaging would be regarded as primary.

 

A supplier audit by yourself or a competent contracted auditor would cover this off. Typical requirements are for the scope to include product safety, traceability, HACCP review, the product security and food defence plan, the product authenticity plan and good manufacturing practices. If contracted then you need to have proof the auditor was competent and review the full audit report.

 

Kind regards,

 

Tony


Similar Discussion Topics
Is Primary Packaging Storage an Enclosed Product Area Under BRCGS Issue 9? Shelf Life of Primary Packaging What supplier documentation is required when using Aluminium Foil as Primary Packaging? Does primary conversion section 5.9 of BRCGS Version 9 apply to lobsters? BRCGS Section 5.9 - Animal Primary Conversion Importing Primary Packaging from China to USA Drop Policy for Raw and Primary Packaging Materials Risk Assessments-Primary Packaging Primary Packaging Food Grade Composition Requirements Regulation relating to a recall for primary packaging