What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

FDA 3300 Refusal: Failure to Declare Allergens – Misbranded or Adulterated?

Started by , May 21 2025 12:09 PM
1 Reply

According to the FDA, a food rejected under reason 3300: "The label fails to declare all major food allergens present in the product, as required by section 403(w)(1)." 403(w) 801(a)(3)

Is a misbranded food. Consumption of a food containing an allergen by a consumer sensitive to that allergen can be very dangerous.

Sometimes the presence of allergens goes unnoticed by the FBO due to cross-contamination or their presence in raw materials, making it difficult to identify their presence on the final product label.

Should a food whose label does not list the presence of a particular allergen be considered a misbranded or adulterated food?

 

Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
Allergen Verification: Do You Need to Test for All Allergens After Changeover? How to Declare Outsourced Processes Under BRCGS Issue 7 Cleaning old school enrober for peanut allergens Environmental Testing Process After Microbial Failure What Allergens Should Be Considered in Hazard Analysis for Raw Materials?
[Ad]

If the product is formulated as such, then yes it is misbranded. If it is a food previously denied admission by the FDA as "reoffer" without correction, then it is adulterated. 

1 Thank

Similar Discussion Topics
Allergen Verification: Do You Need to Test for All Allergens After Changeover? How to Declare Outsourced Processes Under BRCGS Issue 7 Cleaning old school enrober for peanut allergens Environmental Testing Process After Microbial Failure What Allergens Should Be Considered in Hazard Analysis for Raw Materials? CCP failure FDA sub-ingredients: how many generations do we need to declare? Cooler storage temperature failure Ice cream mix pasteurization failure corrective action Vending Machine Allergens