What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]
Forums Blogs Store Members Gallery Directory

Sign In Register

SS 4.3 – Help with Preventive Action for Risk Zoning Non-Conformance

Started by , Jul 04 2025 06:59 PM
Reply to this Topic

Hi Jean-C,

 

Assuming your HACCP team is responsible for this, I think this is as simple as:

Corrective Action: Assessment documented

Preventative Action: HACCP Team briefed with sign off & Assessment/Site Map off Zones added to list of documents reviewed during annual HACCP Review

 

Kind regards,

 

Tony

 

4 Replies
AnswerMinor: The site addressed High Care, Low Risk, enclosed product zones in their HACCP documentation and controls. However, the assessment performed by the site using the appendix 2 of the BRCGS standard is not available for review
As sown above, I recently had my yearly audit and was given a NC on SS:4.3 because I did not have the policy. I only had the Form 4 with all the risks zones highlighted.
Any suggestion on what to add to the preventative action?  I have already created the policy using the Appendix 2 but still having hard time coming up with an acceptable preventive action area to send to the reviewer.
Thanks  , All.
Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
SQF 11.6.5 compliance question - storing packaging in receiving area + dock-platform risk controls FSSC 22000 v6 EMP risk-based determination: looking for a real worked example Is pulling the cords out from the ear buds a risk to contamination? Salmonella Recall: How to Complete Corrective and Preventive Actions After Supplier Contamination Anyone here can share the EMP risk based example?
[Ad]

Did you "retrain" yourself and the haccp team on the element requirement?

No, I have not thought about this one; would this be a preventive action? If so, how do I retrain Myself?

I might or might not have got this right.  But I read that as you have risk zones on your site maps and HACCP plans but you've not recorded how you and the wider team came to that decision that those risk zones were the correct ones.  I'd simply have a HACCP meeting where you discuss that and record your assessment.  They used to have a flow diagram in the old standard you could record your outputs against but I think it caused confusion in some categories but the relevant section is appendix 2.  I'd make sure the areas are discussed and you record notes on your meeting "we agreed our area we've defined as high care is because.... [reference parts from app 2].  We agreed it was not High Risk because..." etc.

 

Does that make sense?

Hi Jean-C,

 

Assuming your HACCP team is responsible for this, I think this is as simple as:

Corrective Action: Assessment documented

Preventative Action: HACCP Team briefed with sign off & Assessment/Site Map off Zones added to list of documents reviewed during annual HACCP Review

 

Kind regards,

 

Tony

 

Reply to this Topic

Similar Discussion Topics
SQF 11.6.5 compliance question - storing packaging in receiving area + dock-platform risk controls FSSC 22000 v6 EMP risk-based determination: looking for a real worked example Is pulling the cords out from the ear buds a risk to contamination? Salmonella Recall: How to Complete Corrective and Preventive Actions After Supplier Contamination Anyone here can share the EMP risk based example? Optical sorter finds walnut shell: best corrective action / investigation path? Raw material risk assessment - where to list turmeric used as a colour? Risk-Based EMP Response by Zone for E. coli vs Salmonella-Listeria BRCGS Clause 8 – Production Risk Zones for Baked and Fried Snacks Risk assessment of clothing and hair policy
About us

IFSQN is an international networking group for food safety professionals. We connect those interested in food safety to information and to each other. The purpose of the website is to share knowledge, experiences and ideas to make food safer.

All content © Copyright 2021 IFSQN