What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

BRCGS Pack 7 , Section 2.5.2 & 2.5.3

Started by , Yesterday, 04:29 AM
0 Reply

Hello all : )

 

HARA Plans - When determining hazard significance using the classic 5x5 Likelihood vs severity matrix:

  • Should a significance rating be assigned NOT considering PRP control effect, and then PRP listed, followed by a second significance rating where PRP effect IS considered? 
  • OR, should there be only one significance rating including PRP control effect because 2.5.2 says " likelihood of occurrence, considering PRP in the absence of additional control"?

it's late in the day here, and my brain is seeing both sides of the argument and confusing wording.

 

We have only PRP's as control mechanisms (thus far) if it helps.

 

Thanks !

Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
What’s New in BRCGS Global Standard Packaging Materials Issue 7? Risk Zoning for Tempeh Production: Low-Risk or High-Risk Under BRCGS? Internal Audit Scheduling Under BRCGS Packaging Standard v7 Should We Use BRCGS START! or Go Directly for Full Certification? How Often Must Product Specifications Be Reviewed Under FDA/BRCGS?
[Ad]

Similar Discussion Topics
What’s New in BRCGS Global Standard Packaging Materials Issue 7? Risk Zoning for Tempeh Production: Low-Risk or High-Risk Under BRCGS? Internal Audit Scheduling Under BRCGS Packaging Standard v7 Should We Use BRCGS START! or Go Directly for Full Certification? How Often Must Product Specifications Be Reviewed Under FDA/BRCGS? Can You Reject the Addition of an Acting BRCGS Auditor? Can Employees Wear Nail Polish with Gloves in BRCGS-Compliant Facilities? Courses Needed for BRCGS Issue 9 Non-Conformance Nominations are now open for the BRCGS Awards 2025 Americas region Supplier Approval Documentation for BRCGS 3.5: How Much Is Enough?