What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

SQF 11.6.5 compliance question - storing packaging in receiving area + dock-platform risk controls

Started by , Yesterday, 08:01 PM
4 Replies

Hello !

 

We have a new construction going and in the receiving area, there would be space for a racking to store products. 

 

I wasn't comfortable into having food contact packaging, but the production manager would like to store extra boxes that would not be in use and would be brought into a different storage area before being used in the packaging area (Separate from production). Of course, there would be a documented inspection before moving the pallet into the storage area.

 

Would that be compliant with SQF ? I am not seeing anything that says it wouldn't, but I have reserves into storing anything in the receiving area.

 

Also, in that area, there wouldn't be a loading / unloading dock, but a floor door with a platform that goes up and down. I am trying to find a way where we could minimize risks to the product to be compliant with 11.6.5 but I am coming up empty.

 

Thank you for your help !

 

 

Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
FSSC 22000 v6 EMP risk-based determination: looking for a real worked example Is pulling the cords out from the ear buds a risk to contamination? US Packaging EPR regulations New ISO 22002 Changes for Food Packaging Manufacturers Anyone here can share the EMP risk based example?
[Ad]

To start, I would ensure that area is included on the master sanitation schedule and on other inspections, such as a GMP facility inspection or pre-operational inspections. Ensure that the product is stored in closed containers to prevent contamination. Inspections prior to release, like you said. 

 

I am having a hard time imaging a what the floor door with platform looks like. Forgive me, otherwise I may have more to add. 

Hi Agrumeambu,

 

The SQF Food Safety Code requires ‘safe, hygienic receipt and storage of raw materials, ingredients, packaging, equipment, and chemicals’. And also: ‘Controls shall be in place to ensure all ingredients, raw materials, processing aids, and packaging are received and stored properly to prevent cross-contamination risks’.

 

I don’t see a major problem if adequate door control and proofing is in place. I would be looking to assess the area for risks and make sure appropriate controls are in place including adequate protection (such as shrink wrap which is removed before going to the packaging area).

 

Other things to consider include adequate segregation, cleaning schedules, pest management/prevention, access for cleaning/inspection.

 

Kind regards,

 

Tony

 

Hi Kelly ! 

 

Thank you for your reply ! Basically, a part of the floor can come up to reach the heigh of a truck so you can unload the pallets with a lift.  

 

Hi Tony, 

 

Thank you also ! 

 

Would you have an idea for the proofing part ? Since trucs won't be fully enclosing the door when they are unloaded / loaded, I'm not sure what could be used to proof the area. Could a air curtain be enough ? 

 

Thank you !

You really should look at bumpers around the doors

 

since you're at the construction phase, now is the time to get it right

 

I can tell you right now, with the temperatures we've been having, my receiving areas still SIGNIFICANTLY colder than I would like as even with 3 sided bumpers, there are still holes around my dock plates  BRRRRRRR

 

The air curtains work great for pests and dust, but not if you need to maintain a temperature


Similar Discussion Topics
FSSC 22000 v6 EMP risk-based determination: looking for a real worked example Is pulling the cords out from the ear buds a risk to contamination? US Packaging EPR regulations New ISO 22002 Changes for Food Packaging Manufacturers Anyone here can share the EMP risk based example? Question of Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 how to define a mixed wheat flour Raw material risk assessment - where to list turmeric used as a colour? BRC CCP decision tree: must we use the new 4-question tree, or can we still use the 5-question one? CCP missed for metal detection in packaging International Regulations and Compliance – Training and Certification Options