Poultry Category Determination
Started by aps, Jun 12 2009 04:33 PM
This is all new to me..... my product background is Produce & Bakery.....
Is frozen chicken slaghter & frozen production classed as LOW OR HIGH Risk?
Please help.
Is frozen chicken slaghter & frozen production classed as LOW OR HIGH Risk?
Please help.
Yeast and Latic Acid limits for Poultry Shelf Life Testing
Maintenance team footwear in production areas of a low risk poultry processing plant
Meat and Poultry Thaw - Ambient Temperature Equation
Manufacture of Poultry, Livestock and Fish Feed HACCP
Mold and Yeast levels in raw poultry
[Ad]
Dear a stoker,
I assume yr end product is (frozen) raw poultry meat.
Not my direct area but the IFST seem to classify the above as high risk, particularly due to campylobacter. See pg4 of this attachment – “control”
campylobacteriosis.pdf 114.26KB 42 downloads
Rgds / Charles.C
I assume yr end product is (frozen) raw poultry meat.
Not my direct area but the IFST seem to classify the above as high risk, particularly due to campylobacter. See pg4 of this attachment – “control”
campylobacteriosis.pdf 114.26KB 42 downloads
Rgds / Charles.C
The chilled food association produce an excellent book called "best practice guidelines for the production of chilled food". It's not cheap but it's useful in most food sites I've worked at and not just useful for chilled food.
http://www.chilledfo...ublications.htm
http://www.tsoshop.c...e.asp?DI=561965
(There are also other publications on that website; some of them free downloads.)
Anyway, in this guide is a flow diagram for deciding on what level of hygiene is required. (Page 39.)
If I follow it for your product, which I assume is raw, frozen chicken meat:
Q1 All components >90oC / 10 min? No
Q2 All components >70oC / 2 min? No
Q3 Not all components >70oC / 2 min? Yes
Q4 Intended to be cooked before consumption? Yes
Result: Low Risk Area. The comment is "Pathogens may remain from original components or recontamination. Cooking instructions must be validated. Shelf life may need to be short unless sufficient hurdles used." (Obviously the shelf life comment is talking about chilled foodstuffs.)
It then goes on with a standard on what the CFA deems as the requirements for the different areas; the "GMP" requirements apply to all areas and so would apply to your Low Risk area. It's important to remember Low Risk is not No Risk. It's worth considering that when you call your area a name. Calling it low risk can confuse people. I would suggest "ready to cook" as it gets the idea across.
http://www.chilledfo...ublications.htm
http://www.tsoshop.c...e.asp?DI=561965
(There are also other publications on that website; some of them free downloads.)
Anyway, in this guide is a flow diagram for deciding on what level of hygiene is required. (Page 39.)
If I follow it for your product, which I assume is raw, frozen chicken meat:
Q1 All components >90oC / 10 min? No
Q2 All components >70oC / 2 min? No
Q3 Not all components >70oC / 2 min? Yes
Q4 Intended to be cooked before consumption? Yes
Result: Low Risk Area. The comment is "Pathogens may remain from original components or recontamination. Cooking instructions must be validated. Shelf life may need to be short unless sufficient hurdles used." (Obviously the shelf life comment is talking about chilled foodstuffs.)
It then goes on with a standard on what the CFA deems as the requirements for the different areas; the "GMP" requirements apply to all areas and so would apply to your Low Risk area. It's important to remember Low Risk is not No Risk. It's worth considering that when you call your area a name. Calling it low risk can confuse people. I would suggest "ready to cook" as it gets the idea across.
Dear a stoker,
I realised after my posting that the terminology of high/low risk can have various meanings and the initial query was not entirely clear on what was actually sought (for obvious reasons ).
Eg L/M/H risk can refer to the assessment of –
(1) hazard
(2) activity
(3) food
(4) area
(5) business
Explanations / illustrations of each are attached below –
LMR___hazard.png 8.32KB 31 downloads
(sorry, should read LMH)
LMH__H____activity.png 5.83KB 32 downloads
LMH__L____activity.png 1.14KB 27 downloads
LMH__H____food.png 2.69KB 26 downloads
LMH__L__H____areas.png 190.1KB 27 downloads
fsai_COP_1.PDF 154.68KB 43 downloads
fsai_COP_3.pdf 90.68KB 39 downloads
Inevitably, all of the above may be raw material / process / consumer specific (amongst others).
The COP attachments (for No.5 above) use a combination of factors resulting in a medium risk for raw poultry product (cooked final product is, unsurprisingly, high risk.) This is primarily with the objective of setting a starting inspection level.
It is quite possible that "medium" may well hv similar hygiene implications as discussed by GMO, I didn't pursue the full text. Pity that GMO's ref. is not dwlable, looks good.
Rgds / Charles.C
PS it would appear that IFST attach more significance to the campylobacter problem than other organisations, or perhaps this was reason for "medium". Or perhaps I misunderstood .
I realised after my posting that the terminology of high/low risk can have various meanings and the initial query was not entirely clear on what was actually sought (for obvious reasons
Eg L/M/H risk can refer to the assessment of –
(1) hazard
(2) activity
(3) food
(4) area
(5) business
Explanations / illustrations of each are attached below –
LMR___hazard.png 8.32KB 31 downloads
(sorry, should read LMH)
LMH__H____activity.png 5.83KB 32 downloads
LMH__L____activity.png 1.14KB 27 downloads
LMH__H____food.png 2.69KB 26 downloads
LMH__L__H____areas.png 190.1KB 27 downloads
fsai_COP_1.PDF 154.68KB 43 downloads
fsai_COP_3.pdf 90.68KB 39 downloads
Inevitably, all of the above may be raw material / process / consumer specific (amongst others).
The COP attachments (for No.5 above) use a combination of factors resulting in a medium risk for raw poultry product (cooked final product is, unsurprisingly, high risk.) This is primarily with the objective of setting a starting inspection level.
It is quite possible that "medium" may well hv similar hygiene implications as discussed by GMO, I didn't pursue the full text. Pity that GMO's ref. is not dwlable, looks good.
Rgds / Charles.C
PS it would appear that IFST attach more significance to the campylobacter problem than other organisations, or perhaps this was reason for "medium". Or perhaps I misunderstood
Yeast and Latic Acid limits for Poultry Shelf Life Testing
Maintenance team footwear in production areas of a low risk poultry processing plant
Meat and Poultry Thaw - Ambient Temperature Equation
Manufacture of Poultry, Livestock and Fish Feed HACCP
Mold and Yeast levels in raw poultry
Checklist for poultry processing industry
Poultry further processing (Chicken nuggets & Strips) - Quality related issues and sensory
Validation Study- Mashed Pot., Mac and Cheese, and Poultry Gravy
Poultry Slaughter CCPs
Shipping food products containing meat and poultry to the United States