What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

Count of 40 cfu/g for Bacillus cereus on a raw ingredient, is this ok?

Started by , Jul 09 2013 03:38 PM
5 Replies

Hi all, finding this website really useful!  Thought I would just throw this one out there as I have looked but have not found confirmation that I am fully satisfied with.  A count of 40 cfu/g for Bacillus cereus on a raw ingredient, is this still ok?  I have checked but everything I have looked at is for finished product and it is within spec for that.  My hesitation is that it is a raw ingredient that will be used in a product that is not really going to be going through any major heat treatment.

 

All advice appreciated!! :)

 

Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
Total spores vs Total plate count in Sterilised product Frozen Salmon Labeling: Can We Adjust Portion Count for Weight Compliance? Why Would APC Count Be Higher in Newer Products? Shelf-Life Spec Clarification Is High HTPC Count in Potable Water a Food Safety Risk? What are effective methods for sanitation of an RO system if high total plate count and pseudomonas aeruginosa are recurring issues?
[Ad]

Hi all, finding this website really useful!  Thought I would just throw this one out there as I have looked but have not found confirmation that I am fully satisfied with.  A count of 40 cfu/g for Bacillus cereus on a raw ingredient, is this still ok?  I have checked but everything I have looked at is for finished product and it is within spec for that.  My hesitation is that it is a raw ingredient that will be used in a product that is not really going to be going through any major heat treatment.

 

All advice appreciated!! :)

 

Dear waferthin,

 

Raw ingredient = ? (it can be relevant), and to be used for ?

 

Rgds / Charles.C

Apologies for the lack of detail, it is albumen to be used in confectionary product.

 

Thanks!

1 Thank

Hi all, finding this website really useful!  Thought I would just throw this one out there as I have looked but have not found confirmation that I am fully satisfied with.  A count of 40 cfu/g for Bacillus cereus on a raw ingredient, is this still ok?  I have checked but everything I have looked at is for finished product and it is within spec for that.  My hesitation is that it is a raw ingredient that will be used in a product that is not really going to be going through any major heat treatment.

 

All advice appreciated!! :)

 

The presence of large numbers of B. cereus (greater than 10^6 organisms/g) in a food is indicative of active growth and proliferation of the organism and is consistent with a potential hazard to health.

 

So your count of 40/g is not high, you need to consider how the ingredient will be used by your customers, the potential for growth and agree an acceptable specification.

 

I assume that you prescribe storage conditions/shelf life and already determine the extent of growth during this time.

 

Regards,

 

Tony

2 Thanks

Dear Waferthin,

 

No direct experience with albumen however I did a little googling.

Most micro. specs for albumen seem to not include B.cereus. Could only find one –

 

specification - EGG_ALBUMEN_POWDER.pdf   151.9KB   14 downloads

 

As per above, yr result is on the borderline however this spec. seems pretty tight to me compared to most RTE product data I could see (the quoted S.aureus limit is a bit odd also).

 

I presume this product is heat treated. I noted that B.cereus normally survives the pasteurization process used for egg products.

 

I  guess the situation  somewhat depends on yr finished product spec and the related process as per Tony.

 

The HPA (ca. 2009) regard  10^3-10^5 as borderline (previously PHLS [2000] considered  >10^4/g as unsatisfactory) in the various RTE products covered.

 

Is yr final product spec. < 100/g or ?? Do you only have one datum (micro. measurements usually have large confidence intervals).

 

Rgds / Charles.C

2 Thanks

Hi,

 

Thank you both for your help.  The product is not currently being manufactured as it is a seasonal product.  It is mallow eggs which do go through

some heat treatment during the process and only have a 3 month shelf-life.  As we are not using it at present I will have it tested again just prior to its use to ensure its safety.  We normally do not have an issue with albumen which is why the result through us a bit.

 

Thanks again!


Similar Discussion Topics
Total spores vs Total plate count in Sterilised product Frozen Salmon Labeling: Can We Adjust Portion Count for Weight Compliance? Why Would APC Count Be Higher in Newer Products? Shelf-Life Spec Clarification Is High HTPC Count in Potable Water a Food Safety Risk? What are effective methods for sanitation of an RO system if high total plate count and pseudomonas aeruginosa are recurring issues? Standard Microbial Count for Equipment and Utensils in Food Industry How to state Air / Yeast & Mould count ? Colony Count Test Standard Plate Count acceptable results Flours effect on APC count?