What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

BRC 5.6.1.1, Product Inspection and Testing

Started by , Jul 07 2016 04:06 PM
2 Replies

I don't post very much but have learned much from reading topics posted here.

 

My question is I'm having a little difficulty answering a NC from my BRC audit in June. The NC was clause 5.6.1.1.  I wonder if I'm overthinking this or not thinking logically.

 

I had no risk assessment for finished product / environmental monitoring.

 

I work at a bottled water plant very low risk.  I have the methods and specification limit for testing outlined in the QC procedures.

 

I don't have a frequency assigned as our CCP is ozonation and monitoring times are indicated, all other testing is conducted when the ozone is checked in the lab.  I'm hung on the risk assessment required at this clause - should I do a risk assessment for the microbiological, chemical, physical and organoleptic?

 

 Any help would be appreciated. I did a search for this clause in the forum but 1 link is missing and the other 2 were not on page listed.

thanks again.

Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
ICE Raids-Anyone update existing regulatory inspection PnP? Your Compressed Air Testing Checklist – Need-to-knows for regular monitoring Your Compressed Air Testing Checklist – Need-to-knows for regular monitoring Your Compressed Air Testing Checklist – Need-to-knows for regular monitoring How Often Must Product Specifications Be Reviewed Under FDA/BRCGS?
[Ad]

You do this in your general HACCP risk assessment dont you? At least thats what I did. I based the frequency and what needs to be tested on my risk assessment

Hi sheilag,

 

5.6.1.1

There shall be a scheduled programme of testing covering products and the processing environment,
which may include microbiological, chemical, physical and organoleptic testing according to risk. The
methods, frequency and specified limits shall be documented

 

IMO the English is ambiguous but is probably intended to mean that the "risk" bit is (a) mandatory and (b) to be documented.

 

"How" is arbitrary of course. Just one of the customary BRC irritants.

 

Maybe some kind person with the I.Guidelines can offer a suggestion.

 

PS - this thread seemed to offer a solution to me -

 

http://www.ifsqn.com...c-issue-7-5611/

1 Thank

Similar Discussion Topics
ICE Raids-Anyone update existing regulatory inspection PnP? Your Compressed Air Testing Checklist – Need-to-knows for regular monitoring Your Compressed Air Testing Checklist – Need-to-knows for regular monitoring Your Compressed Air Testing Checklist – Need-to-knows for regular monitoring How Often Must Product Specifications Be Reviewed Under FDA/BRCGS? Is Air Testing required if the compressed air we use is only for the machines? Total spores vs Total plate count in Sterilised product How to Label 'Natural Type Flavors' on US Product Packaging Supplier withdrawal for metal contamination, but own MDs have not detected in Finished Product Product Recall Expert