What's New Unreplied Topics Membership About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
[Ad]

Why there is so much confusion between CCP, OPRP & PRP?

Started by , Dec 20 2016 04:50 PM
5 Replies
In any food industry why their is so much so much confusion between CCP, OPRP & PRP?
Is the ISO standards inadequate or the message is not clear by ISO 22000:2005 FSMS course's.
Share this Topic
Topics you might be interested in
OPRP Hand Washing Procedure Is receiving raw materials and storing them a PRP or OPRP? Hazard assessment methodology in food for determining CCP or OPRP? Validation Study for OPRP - Sieving Process Reduction of OPRP monitoring frequency
[Ad]

In any food industry why their is so much so much confusion between CCP, OPRP & PRP?
Is the ISO standards inadequate or the message is not clear by ISO 22000:2005 FSMS course's.

 

Hi udayguleria,

 

(1) IMO the original problem lies with the ambiguity of the meaning of OPRP as introduced by the iso22000 standard.

(2) The second problem comes with the ambiguity of the procedure for determining OPRPs as introduced/expanded by the iso22000/iso22004 standards.

(3) And the rest from the range/unclarity of the opinions of "experts" based on their interpretation of (1,2) above.

HI

IMO this is the simple explanation: poor understanding of the approach: oPRP and PRP and the moain ISO 22000 approach: combination of control instead of CCPs.

HI

IMO this is the simple explanation: poor understanding of the approach: oPRP and PRP and the moain ISO 22000 approach: combination of control instead of CCPs.

 

Hi Wer,

 

I'm sorry but I have no idea what the above means. Maybe there is a language difficulty.

HI Maybe the language. What I wanted to say is that understanding of ISO 22000 philosohpy might be difficult for some of people. This philosophy bases on the COmbination of the control implemented on the different steps process which allow to keep the hazard on the acceptable limits of reduce this.

HI Maybe the language. What I wanted to say is that understanding of ISO 22000 philosohpy might be difficult for some of people. This philosophy bases on the COmbination of the control implemented on the different steps process which allow to keep the hazard on the acceptable limits of reduce this.

 

Hi Wer,

 

Thanks for above. Now i understand and Yes, i agree that the ISO22000 Standard requires adjusting one's HACCP viewpoint.

 

I like the start of ISO22000's haccp section a lot but unfortunately (IMO)  section 7.4.4 is a disaster of confusion. Iso22004 is a major improvement regarding (iso-haccp) philosophy  concerning differentiating between CCPs/OPRPs but not very useful regarding practical implementation. Even the authors of iso22000 had different opinions as to the interpretation of OPRP :smile: .

 

The issue of determining CCP/OPRPs has (IMO) wasted so much time for so many people !!


Similar Discussion Topics
OPRP Hand Washing Procedure Is receiving raw materials and storing them a PRP or OPRP? Hazard assessment methodology in food for determining CCP or OPRP? Validation Study for OPRP - Sieving Process Reduction of OPRP monitoring frequency Summary Plan Template for PRP/oPRP's Setting Manual sorting as OPRP-CCP Should Metal detector be an OPRP or CCP? Metal Detector as a last step - is this a CCP or OPRP? What difference between CP and OPRP in ISO 22000