Consultation Draft for BRC Packaging Issue 6 now available

Question

Consultation Draft for BRC Packaging Issue 6 now available

Started by JoGriffiths.BRCGS, Nov 19 2018 01:01 PM

Reply to this Topic

JoGriffiths.BRCGS

IFSQN Active

6 Replies

19 November 2018 - 01:01 PM

Hi all,

I thought you might be interested to see the draft, it contains all the draft requirements plus the protocol changes planned. Downloadable from https://www.brcgloba...t-consultation/

Deadline for feedback is December 15th 2018.

Likely publication date is summer 2019, with audits effective early 2020.

Thanks!

Jo

6 Thanks

Share this Topic

Topics you might be interested in

New Consultation Opens for GFSI Benchmarking Requirements v2024 BRCGS Packaging Materials Issue 6 Feedback - Public Consultation May Contain - allergen consultation from the FSA Draft of ISO 9001:2015 has been published for consultation EFSA request consultation on microbe removal substances for meat

Reply to this Topic

Similar Discussion Topics

New Consultation Opens for GFSI Benchmarking Requirements v2024 BRCGS Packaging Materials Issue 6 Feedback - Public Consultation May Contain - allergen consultation from the FSA Draft of ISO 9001:2015 has been published for consultation EFSA request consultation on microbe removal substances for meat Consultation on meat labelling Food Standards Agency Consultation

bduzan IFSQN Active · Answer 1 · 2018-11-20T13:24:16+00:00

Thanks' JoGriffiths.BRCGS' for posting. I've been reading through the standard and came to 5.4.8 . Does anyone else think that these additions are a bit excessive? Do we really need a separate line clearance procedure for each type of line that describes all areas of potential entrapment of materials? And 'roles of persons'...really? Here's the proposed clause:

The documented line clearance procedure shall include:

• the roles of persons involved in line clearance

• areas where materials can become trapped

• validation of the line clearance

• sign-off for continuing production

The line clearance procedure shall be fully implemented for each production run.

Thanks for your input,

BD

Polin IFSQN Associate · Answer 2 · 2019-01-15T10:02:23+00:00

Thank you "JoGriffiths.BRCGS" for your post.

Regarding the adjustment of 5.4.8. I will agree with "bduzan" that it is excessive.

My question is, how and by who this requirement could be practically and effectively implemented?

In our company, we are already keeping records in a callendar, for each machine seperately. The production workers (printing-laminating) write down the product code/order number/production quantity and the name of the first operator.

So could we just add an extra column for the first operator to sign for validation of the line clearance and continuing the next production?

Thank you in advance.

Polin

Skyhaze IFSQN Active · Answer 3 · 2019-03-13T10:35:32+00:00

Does anyone have a copy of the draft standard? I had a look through it when it was first released but didn't get round to copying it and now it's unavailable. I would like to be able to have another look through it though!

bduzan IFSQN Active · Answer 4 · 2019-03-13T11:16:38+00:00

Does anyone have a copy of the draft standard? I had a look through it when it was first released but didn't get round to copying it and now it's unavailable. I would like to be able to have another look through it though!

Hi Skyhaze, I saved a copy. I hope I attached it correctly.

final-brcpackagingissue6consultationdraft.pdf 523.5KB 216 downloads

Best Regards,

Bryan