Methodology for control measures categorization as per ISO 22000 7 questions
Dear All
i am preparing matrix for categorization of control measures based on ISO 22000: 2018 7 questions. but i have concern on below : is this correct which i select or may need some correction ? suggestion shall be valuable for use to make effective methodology.
Feasibility for monitoring ©
High: 3
Continuous
Medium: 2
At defined frequency
Low: 1
Monitoring is difficult / manual
Probability of failure of control measure (A)
High: 3
Often: Once in a month
Medium: 2
Occasionally: Once in a 6 months
Low: 1
Marginal: Maybe once in a year
Consequence in case of failure of control measure (B)
High: 3
Definitely affect the product
Medium: 2
May affect the product
Low: 1
Marginal impact on end product not affecting food safety
Feasibility for monitoring ©
High: 3
Continuous
Medium: 2
At defined frequency
Low: 1
Monitoring is difficult / manual
Effect on the Hazard (D)
High: 3
Eliminate the Hazard
Medium: 2
Reduction to acceptable level
Low: 1
Prevent the Hazard
Is there is successive control measure? (E)
Yes: 0
There is an successive control measure
No: 3
This is the final control measure
Is the control measure specifically designed? (F)
Yes: 3
Specifically designed
No: 0
Not specifically designed
Is there synergistic effect with other control measures? (G)
Yes: 3
Synergistic effect
No: 0
No any synergistic effect
Dear All
i am preparing matrix for categorization of control measures based on ISO 22000: 2018 7 questions. but i have concern on below : is this correct which i select or may need some correction ? suggestion shall be valuable for use to make effective methodology.
Feasibility for monitoring ©
High: 3
Continuous
Medium: 2
At defined frequency
Low: 1
Monitoring is difficult / manual
Probability of failure of control measure (A)
High: 3
Often: Once in a month
Medium: 2
Occasionally: Once in a 6 months
Low: 1
Marginal: Maybe once in a year
Consequence in case of failure of control measure (B)
High: 3
Definitely affect the product
Medium: 2
May affect the product
Low: 1
Marginal impact on end product not affecting food safety
Feasibility for monitoring ©
High: 3
Continuous
Medium: 2
At defined frequency
Low: 1
Monitoring is difficult / manual
Effect on the Hazard (D)
High: 3
Eliminate the Hazard
Medium: 2
Reduction to acceptable level
Low: 1
Prevent the Hazard
Is there is successive control measure? (E)
Yes: 0
There is an successive control measure
No: 3
This is the final control measure
Is the control measure specifically designed? (F)
Yes: 3
Specifically designed
No: 0
Not specifically designed
Is there synergistic effect with other control measures? (G)
Yes: 3
Synergistic effect
No: 0
No any synergistic effect
Hi sunil malethia,
All proposed solutions, both qualitative and quantitative, are inevitably subjective in some parts. A near Encyclopedia of possible methodologies exists.
Can compare your evaluation methodology to this one -
https://www.ifsqn.co...18/#entry138153
(Most of your scores looked reasonable to me [I usually avoid giving time periods since some BPC hazards can make them contentious]. IIRC the "synergy" aspect was removed in Standard's 2018 version + a (very) few other items/modifications were added as compared to Standard's 2005 version).
If one prefers a non-quantitative approach, the (ageing) Coca-cola solution (see post 24 following above link) is IMO still very useful.
Alternatively another, recent, detailed analysis (albeit IMO sometimes debatable) is provided in the FSSC22000 ver 5. Guidance material (or prob. any later, more up-to-date versions). (freely available afaik from FSSC website).
thanks for your valuable inputs on raised concern