Threshold for Labeling Hydrolyzed Proteins in the US
What degree of hydrolysis requires a protein to be labeled as hydrolyzed in the US? Specific context is for pea protein being referred to by a supplier as "partially hydrolyzed" but "not required to be labeled as hydrolyzed". I have been unable to locate a specific threshold even after reviewing the submissions to FDA for GRAS approval of various pea protein products.
Thank you for your time!
I spent a small amount of time looking.
IMO the product should be labled as partially hydrolyzed pea protein. It shouldnt be declared as hydrolyzed. Ther is a difference. Any advice otherwise should include refrence to a applicable regulation.
I couldnt find the fda regulation referenced in the attached usda doc. It suggests the cut off is 0.62 AN/TN.
https://www.fsis.usd...1995-0001_0.pdf
Thank you for your response! It calls out "may". If it is not required, then would it just be labeled as pea protein or pea protein isolate if you elect not to employ the optional ""partially," "mildly," or "lightly,"" hydrolyzed?
Context: Application is a high protein extruded vegan crisp and not a meat product. Usage is >60% of the formulation.
Thank you for your response! It calls out "may". If it is not required, then would it just be labeled as pea protein or pea protein isolate if you elect not to employ the optional ""partially," "mildly," or "lightly,"" hydrolyzed?
Context: Application is a high protein extruded vegan crisp and not a meat product. Usage is >60% of the formulation.
I think the "MAY" refers to "partially," "mildly," or "lightly," You can pick one of them. I cant find the exact regulation to verify the acceptability of "lightly" and "mildly", I have only seen it labeled as "partially". Thus, that is the one I would use.
Are you trying to avoid any reference to "hydrolyzed"? I dont think "Pea Protein" or "Pea Protein Isolate" "fits" this product. If your supplier state that it is "partially hydrolyzed pea protein", i think you are stuck with it.
Switch to non-hydrolyzed version?
Without getting too specific.... per the supplier "it is below the hydrolyzed percentage that requires being labelled as hydrolyzed". I don't agree with the supplier. I am in alignment with your suggestion to transition to a non-hydrolyzed version.
I am unable to "prove" the "experts" are mistaken to my internal team and would like to cite regulatory specifics as grounds to move to an alternative raw material.
Without getting too specific.... per the supplier "it is below the hydrolyzed percentage that requires being labelled as hydrolyzed". I don't agree with the supplier. I am in alignment with your suggestion to transition to a non-hydrolyzed version.
I am unable to "prove" the "experts" are mistaken to my internal team and would like to cite regulatory specifics as grounds to move to an alternative raw material.
Does your supplier label it as just "Pea Protein"? Or do they label it "Partially Hydrolyzed Pea Protein"? I guess if the suppliers spec sheet and label state "Pea Protein", id be fine with that. But is sounds like that is not what is happening and there is some kind of side discussion.
I guess the info I gave you was the cut off for partial vs full. I didnt see any info on where "pea protein" becomes "partially hydrolyzed pea protein".
Im sorry, Ive been there. Had to sit through a meeting once where: MSG contains glutamate, tomatoes are natural and contain natural glutamates, therefor MSG is just "Natual Flavor".