How is verification and validation recorded
Welcome to the forum !
I respectfully suggest that you are more likely to get a useful answer if you post a particular activity which you are interested in the validation / verification of ?
As you probably know there are many existing general forum threads on this topic, including iso 22000.
Rgds / Charles.C
Thanks for your reply indeed.
Dear zillaz,
Welcome to the forum !
I respectfully suggest that you are more likely to get a useful answer if you post a particular activity which you are interested in the validation / verification of ?
As you probably know there are many existing general forum threads on this topic, including iso 22000.
Rgds / Charles.C
we are chandlers so in short we buy from the market and sell to our customers, anyhow we repack some items like spice for example (the only hazard in my possession). I just need to know which records needs to be verified and validated (we currently posses ISO:9002), I'm done with most of the records example like Products Description and Intended Use, Hazard Analysis, Cleaning Schedule, Temp. Record(Cool Rooms, Freezer, Receival, Dispatch) any many more. but in vain for Validation & Verification, I need a thorough HELP
Thanks for your reply indeed.
Verification can be as simple as signature or initials on the documentation used for monitoring. It should be someone other than the person doing the monitoring (typically a supervisor or QA person). It is meant to show that someone is checking each monitoring process to ensure it is completed and any issues were addressed. It is typically only done for CCP but you could choose to do it for OPRP.
Validation will depend on your process and is as you describe proof of effectiveness. It is how you show that the critical control that you put in place can be met. It could be a validation study on an oven confirming temperature and kill steps or a capability study on a process. It is generally conducted on a regular schedule to ensure it continues to meet needs (monthly, quarterly, annually, etc. depending on risk).
Sorry, stinky nappy to attend to... Actually make that very stinky!
As you can see, the validation is rather "item" oriented.
Did you in fact hv any CCPs ?
Rgds / Charles.C
PS i expect you saw it already but this recent post in another thread might interest you also -
http://www.ifsqn.com...dpost__p__44822
Dear Zillaz,
As you can see, the validation is rather "item" oriented.
Did you in fact hv any CCPs ?
Rgds / Charles.C
PS i expect you saw it already but this recent post in another thread might interest you also -
http://www.ifsqn.com...dpost__p__44822
ð Validation = Current (proof what you are doing is effective)
· Temperature checks of product, processes or equipment
· Microbiological tests
· Visual checks of personnel, processes, and finished product
Methods for Verification of Legal, Food Safety & Quality Controls
ð Verification = Past (proof you are doing what you say you are doing)
· Review of reports, analysis, records, and audits
· Method of obtaining the necessary information
· Responsibility of form or report
· Critical limits for safety, quality and legality
· Date each record is validated (approved)
ð Validation = Current (proof what you are doing is effective)
Sorry, i don't agree (ideally anyway).
IMO, "current" should be "preliminary". (Unless you specify an "Operational" Validation perhaps ?
@Zillaz, thks for the CCP info. (purchasing, packaging).
One possible (perhaps the most basic) answer to yr original question might be a 3-column table. column 1 would be the specific CCP/hazard (cross referenced to yr haccp plan CCP details), 2nd could be a reference to a published work demonstrating the validity of yr own chosen preventive measure and 3rd column another cross-reference to data which you hv (trial) obtained to support column 2 (if required)
If you wish for further specific input I suggest you provide a little more info., eg the specific hazards / preventive measure / critical limits which you wish to Va/Ve.
Rgds / Charles.C