Please review my HACCP Plan
Hello,
Attcach a HACCP plan, asking if possible I can get your help to change or add
many thanks in advance
Call me old fashioned , but...... It is my understanding that each step of the process must be riak assessed for the following hazards:
Biological - Pathogen, growth
-
When I was at the advanced HACCP training course a couple of years ago they gave us the format attached.
Feck... I poster that and didn't mean to
Biological - Pathogen contamination
Pathogen growth
Pathogen survival
Chemical - Oils or greases from equipment
Cleaning chemical residues
Antibiotics.
Physical - People, premises, plant, Pests, packaging
Allergens - any one of the 13 listed in EU.
Here is the template we were given.
Feckity feck I did it again
Attached Files
Hello,
Attcach a HACCP plan, asking if possible I can get your help to change or add
many thanks in advance
Hi Sarah,
I agree with Trubert. You should have Biological, Chemical, and Physical hazards listed for each step; even if there are none. You do have a very thorough analysis though.
So as an example, in your shipping step according to the excel file:
- Biological - Pests, Microbial Growth (Yeast & Mold) from degraded materials and/or improper storage.
- Chemical - None
- Physical - Damage to the Container (foreign substance introduced to the material).
QAGB
Dear,
HACCP not means just use a fixed format and work as fixed way. For applying HACCP for any product the simplest ways are as follow-
1.Just collect the scientific knowledge about the product.
2.Do risk assessment on each steps.
3.Control measure for each risk.
4.Than categorize the control measures as ccp or Oprp.
And format is not important for HACCP.
thank you
sunil mishra
Hi sarah,
Product / process ?
Any particular FS standard ? ISO/fssc ?
Actually i thought the basic layout is getting there ( but maybe depending on the Standard) but the Risk Assessment is confused.
.
To reiterate somewhat -
Hazards.png 135.37KB 48 downloads
Right or wrong, we added allergens along with the Biological, chemical and physical.
Auditors seem to like the idea.
JB
Thank you all i will work on it
Hi sarah,
Product / process ?
Any particular FS standard ? ISO/fssc ?
Actually i thought the basic layout is getting there ( but maybe depending on the Standard) but the Risk Assessment is confused.
.
To reiterate somewhat -
Mr. Charles, may I know where did you get this picture from? seems that the document has a lot of good information that I'm in need right now.
Appreciate it!
Mr. Charles, may I know where did you get this picture from? seems that the document has a lot of good information that I'm in need right now.
Appreciate it!
Hi Jean,
Sorry, was 2 years ago, can't remember the source.
You could try copying the first line of text and googling. Often works for me.
Added - See Next Post
addendum
It appeared, maybe originally, in this text -
guidelines on haccp.GMP,ASEAN food,manual - haccp_en.pdf 1.97MB 126 downloads
(Pg 83)
And, presumably borrowed, in other later documents -
development of haccp plan for soy-based foods.pdf 2.22MB 119 downloads
(pg 275)
Hey Sarah,
Here is a quick template shot of what we use for our risks. We do more distribution and third party logistics so it is not by ingredient or anything but you can get the basic idea from this. Hope it helps.
Hazard Analysis Receiving.docx 19.36KB 178 downloads
Cheers!
Hey Sarah,
Here is a quick template shot of what we use for our risks. We do more distribution and third party logistics so it is not by ingredient or anything but you can get the basic idea from this. Hope it helps.
Hazard Analysis Receiving.docx
Cheers!
Hi Brendan,
Just noticed the above.
Useful Layout, Thks. (I presume FSMA oriented)
I guess "FSRAM" = "FS risk assessment matrix" but how to interpret the data in risk eval. columns (eg "2...D...12") ??
Hi.
I am not sure which risk asseement matrix did Brendan used to interprete the hazard severity and likelihood, but I am using the FS risk assessment matrix from this link
http://www.correcttr...nd_ccp_tree.pdf . The numbers looks similar to the one shared by Brendan, but this has its interpretation in it.
Good luck :)
Hi.
I am not sure which risk asseement matrix did Brendan used to interprete the hazard severity and likelihood, but I am using the FS risk assessment matrix from this link
http://www.correcttr...nd_ccp_tree.pdf . The numbers looks similar to the one shared by Brendan, but this has its interpretation in it.
Good luck :)
Hi liyana,
thks for input.
As i understand, cells above the (safety) line > CCPs. Far too rigid IMO.
I also don't agree with the use of "generic" recall/complaint titles as appropriate for safety severities.
However risk matrices are indisputably subjective. :smile: