Please review my HACCP Plan

Hello,

Attcach a  HACCP plan, asking if possible I can get your help to change or add

many thanks in advance

Call me old fashioned , but...... It is my understanding that each step of the process must be riak assessed for the following hazards:

Biological - Pathogen, growth

              -

When I was at the advanced HACCP training course a couple of years ago they gave us the format attached.

Feck... I poster that and didn't mean to

Biological - Pathogen contamination

                Pathogen growth

                Pathogen survival

Chemical - Oils or greases from equipment

                 Cleaning chemical residues

                Antibiotics.

Physical -  People, premises, plant, Pests, packaging

Allergens - any one of the 13 listed in EU.

Here is the template we were given.

Feckity feck I did it again

 

Hello,

Attcach a  HACCP plan, asking if possible I can get your help to change or add

 

 

many thanks in advance

 

Hi Sarah,

I agree with Trubert. You should have Biological, Chemical, and Physical hazards listed for each step; even if there are none. You do have a very thorough analysis though.

So as an example, in your shipping step according to the excel file:

• Biological - Pests, Microbial Growth (Yeast & Mold) from degraded materials and/or improper storage.
• Chemical - None
• Physical - Damage to the Container (foreign substance introduced to the material).

QAGB

Dear,

HACCP not means just use a fixed  format and work as fixed way. For applying HACCP for any product the simplest ways are as follow-

1.Just collect the scientific knowledge about the product.

2.Do risk assessment on each steps.

3.Control measure for each risk.

4.Than categorize the control measures as ccp or Oprp.

And format is not important for HACCP.

thank you

sunil mishra

Hi sarah,

Product / process ?

Any particular FS standard ? ISO/fssc ?

Actually i thought the basic layout is getting there ( but maybe depending on the Standard)  but the Risk Assessment is confused.

.

To reiterate somewhat -

Hazards.png   135.37KB   49 downloads

Right or wrong, we added allergens along with the Biological, chemical and physical.

Auditors seem to like the idea.

JB

Thank you all i will work on it 

 

Hi sarah,

 

Product / process ?

 

Any particular FS standard ? ISO/fssc ?

 

Actually i thought the basic layout is getting there ( but maybe depending on the Standard)  but the Risk Assessment is confused.

.

To reiterate somewhat -

 

Hazards.png

 

 

Mr. Charles, may I know where did you get this picture from? seems that the document has a lot of good information that I'm in need right now.

Appreciate it!

 

Mr. Charles, may I know where did you get this picture from? seems that the document has a lot of good information that I'm in need right now.

 

Appreciate it!

 

Hi Jean,

Sorry, was 2 years ago, can't remember the source.

You could try copying the first line of text and googling. Often works for me.

Added - See Next Post

addendum

It appeared, maybe originally, in this text -

guidelines on haccp.GMP,ASEAN food,manual - haccp_en.pdf   1.97MB   129 downloads

(Pg 83)

And, presumably borrowed, in other later documents -

development of haccp plan for soy-based foods.pdf   2.22MB   124 downloads

(pg 275)

Hey Sarah,

Here is a quick template shot of what we use for our risks.  We do more distribution and third party logistics so it is not by ingredient or anything but you can get the basic idea from this.  Hope it helps. 

Hazard Analysis Receiving.docx   19.36KB   184 downloads

Cheers!

Hey Sarah,

 

Here is a quick template shot of what we use for our risks.  We do more distribution and third party logistics so it is not by ingredient or anything but you can get the basic idea from this.  Hope it helps. 

 

Hazard Analysis Receiving.docx

 

Cheers!

Hi Brendan,

Just noticed the above.

Useful Layout, Thks. (I presume FSMA oriented)

I guess  "FSRAM" = "FS risk assessment matrix"  but how to  interpret the data in risk eval. columns (eg "2...D...12") ??

Hi.

I am not sure which risk asseement matrix did Brendan used to interprete the hazard severity and likelihood, but I am using the FS risk assessment matrix from this link

http://www.correcttr...nd_ccp_tree.pdf . The numbers looks similar to the one shared by Brendan, but this has its interpretation in it.

Good luck :)

Hi.

I am not sure which risk asseement matrix did Brendan used to interprete the hazard severity and likelihood, but I am using the FS risk assessment matrix from this link

http://www.correcttr...nd_ccp_tree.pdf . The numbers looks similar to the one shared by Brendan, but this has its interpretation in it.

 

Good luck :)

Hi liyana,

thks for input.

As i understand, cells above the (safety) line >  CCPs. Far too rigid IMO.

I also don't agree with the use of "generic" recall/complaint titles as appropriate for safety severities.

However risk matrices are indisputably subjective. :smile: