What to take into account when reviewing an existing bait map?
Started by TEJUSAN, Oct 26 2012 11:01 AM
good day all,
what all things we should take in to account when we review an existing bait map?
what all things we should take in to account when we review an existing bait map?
Is a Written Procedure Required for Existing Products According to BRCGS Clause 5.1.1?
Reviewing and Updating Policies
Is there an existing compendium of manufacturing insignias pertinent to PET and Glass bottles?
GFSI certification for current or existing suppliers
SQF Minor: Bait Station Open
[Ad]
good day all,
what all things we should take in to account when we review an existing bait map?
The main thing you are looking for is does the map accurately reflect the actual placement of your bait stations.
Do the quantity and location match?
Ideally, they should be placed 15-30 meters apart.
If you have trend data that shows a higher incidence of bait taking, you may want to have a higher concentration of devices in those areas.
Marshall
1 Thank
Is a Written Procedure Required for Existing Products According to BRCGS Clause 5.1.1?
Reviewing and Updating Policies
Is there an existing compendium of manufacturing insignias pertinent to PET and Glass bottles?
GFSI certification for current or existing suppliers
SQF Minor: Bait Station Open
BRC P. 3.5.1.1 - - Do I take into account radiological hazards when assessing risk
Adding New Warehouse to FDA Account
Existing SQF Facility to Add another facility location for Storage and Distribution
Integrating BRC requirements into an existing system without creating a separate BRC Manual
FSSC 222000 procedure for reviewing specifications