Dear Soda,
Welcome to the forum !
Interesting queries. Indeed, BRC seem to have fallen in love with "risk assessment". I suppose utmost diligence in all things has to be respected but .........
Must be giving the auditor's a few troubled sleep nights also ?! Possibly GFSI also.
My guess is that generally people are categorising their products, eh high/low risk, and minimally modifying existing procedures in more explicitly quantified ways compared to the intuitive style they might hv used previously, eg with respect to sampling density and corrective action levels.
Hv seen some quite deep microbiological approaches to risk assessments for raw material contracts in the case of complex products like pizza but I predict that most auditors would not demand (or understand ?) such rigor.
The use of pseudo - risk evaluation parameters such as inspection defect percentages hv been around since Adam of course. The recursive sampling procedures in Mil.Stds are one example.
Sorry don't hv a case example for yr specific question, anybody ??
Rgds / Charles.C
added - although not applicable to yr specific query, you might take a look at this recent thread also -
http://www.ifsqn.com...showtopic=10184