Does the ISO22000 standard give the assessor any ammunition to make a finding if the client has opted not to use an oPRP say a filter managing FM at a filler and instead chooses to use a generic PRP and how would the case for objective evidence be constructed?
How would the reasoning differ say from the filler where sanitation is reducing a hazard but again a PRP , namely sanitation is being used?
Similalry an extension of this would be that there are two filters "A" and "B" both located pre filler but "B" for lack of a better word is the " terminal" filter, its the final "gate keeper"
Does it make sense to say its not a oPRP because ..... its not a choking hazard .....it only provides a partial reduction not elimination, etc.
Thanks
'
- Home
- Sponsors
- Forums
- Members ˅
- Resources ˅
- Files
- FAQ ˅
- Jobs
-
Webinars ˅
- Upcoming Food Safety Fridays
- Recorded Food Safety Fridays
- Upcoming Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Recorded Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Food Safety Live 2013
- Food Safety Live 2014
- Food Safety Live 2015
- Food Safety Live 2016
- Food Safety Live 2017
- Food Safety Live 2018
- Food Safety Live 2019
- Food Safety Live 2020
- Food Safety Live 2021
- Training ˅
- Links
- Store ˅
- More