Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Will visual inspection suffice in verifying/validating PRP's?

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic
- - - - -

mind over matter

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 369 posts
  • 44 thanks
3
Neutral

  • Philippines
    Philippines

Posted 10 October 2011 - 10:25 AM

Or one must do more than visual inspection and provide some (other) evidence to ensure that the set control over the critical point is effective?

I know a very little about this. I am no longer in the food industry and I am asking this only out of curiousity.

My thanks in advance if anyone can help with this.



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5666 thanks
1,546
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 10 October 2011 - 01:48 PM

Or one must do more than visual inspection and provide some (other) evidence to ensure that the set control over the critical point is effective?

I know a very little about this. I am no longer in the food industry and I am asking this only out of curiosity.

My thanks in advance if anyone can help with this.

Dear MOM,

Assuming that the "set point" is interpreted by the Critical Limits, then the answer is that a visual parameter is possible with some "support", eg para. 7.6.3 contains the statement -

Critical Limits based on subjective data (such as visual inspection of product, process, handling etc) shall be supported by instructions or specifications and/or education and training.


Rgds / Charles.C

PS I am also assuming yr topic title was meant to read CCPs rather than PRPs ? :smile:

Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


mind over matter

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 369 posts
  • 44 thanks
3
Neutral

  • Philippines
    Philippines

Posted 10 October 2011 - 02:51 PM

PS I am also assuming yr topic title was meant to read CCPs rather than PRPs ? :smile:

No, Fav. Charles C. I was really referring to the requirement for validation of OPRP's, not CCP's. What does ISO 22000 say about it?

Edited by mind over matter, 11 October 2011 - 10:52 AM.


Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5666 thanks
1,546
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 10 October 2011 - 07:35 PM

Dear MOM,

Generalising, both CCPs and OPRPs are associated with control measures deemed necessary to manage significant hazards as determined from the hazard analysis.

ISO 22004 notes that (for the two types of control measure referred above):

Subclause 8.2 of ISO 22000 requires that validation demonstrates that the combination of control measures is capable of achieving the intended level of control.


There are no clauses AFAIK which exclude any specific procedures being utilised to achieve validation as above. But whether any particular procedure will "suffice" will depend on the situation / results :smile:

Note that, according to ISO 22004,

Where a control measure cannot be validated, it cannot be included within a HACCP plan or in OPRPs, but it can be applied within PRPs.


Rgds / Charles.C

Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:


Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users