After QSDA's post it got me thinking about non conformities I have and haven't argued about in the past with a BRC auditor.
On my last site we had 2 minors in our first BRC audit. One of them was this (and I'm paraphrasing):
"There are no contact details for the incident team in the incident manual."
The contacts were in a separate document but this was referenced, hyperlinked and printed out for the hard copy. The reason for this was so if contact details changed, the document could be changed easily without having to retrain everyone. (I note in verson 6, it specifically says that's ok but it didn't say anywhere in version 5 that it wasn't ok!) I didn't bother arguing.
At my current site, there was one point raised along these lines:
"There is a bad smell in the gents changing"
Ok. Hmm. Well obviously a bad smell might indicate something is wrong like a drain issue, or perhaps lack of cleaning (but they could show cleaning records) or it could just be 60 men using the space designed for 20 and let's face it, men can be a bit whiffy, especially if they've worked 12 hours at 30 degrees plus. I wasn't on site during the audit as I wasn't working for the company then but I would have loved to see what section of the standard said the toilets aren't allowed to smell... I mean what level of smell is acceptable? Where is the critical limit? Are we talking mild whiffs or a mixture of camembert and farmyard here?
- Home
- Sponsors
- Forums
- Members ˅
- Resources ˅
- Files
- FAQ ˅
- Jobs
-
Webinars ˅
- Upcoming Food Safety Fridays
- Upcoming Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Recorded Food Safety Fridays
- Recorded Food Safety Essentials
- Recorded Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Food Safety Live 2013
- Food Safety Live 2014
- Food Safety Live 2015
- Food Safety Live 2016
- Food Safety Live 2017
- Food Safety Live 2018
- Food Safety Live 2019
- Food Safety Live 2020
- Food Safety Live 2021
- Training ˅
- Links
- Store ˅
- More