Hi everybody,
I am working with a food ingredient supplier to help them develop their HACCP and Hazard Analysis for their raw materials in advance of them seeking ISO22000 registration towards the end of 2012.
I am aware that ISO22000 states that documented procedures must be in place for a number of key areas eg control of documents,corrective action, internal audits etc.
I know that there are many suppliers of templates for ISO22000 documentation and was curious about the views, likes and dislikes of ISO22000 auditors with respect to style / layout of the documents. However how do different auditors view variation in document style for recording results of the Hazard Analysis and selection of PRPs etc?
Clearly emphasis should be on following a logical, structured and comprehensive process in selection PRPs or carrying out a Harzard Analysis but how do different auditors view variations in the style, layout and content of documentation like Hazard Analysis checklists?
Are auditors looking a records showing the process that has been gone through to evaluate what hazards exist or are they mainly interested in the final outcome ie a plan showing the hazards, targets / critical limits, control measures, PRP / OPRP / CCP etc?
Would welcome anyones views on this!
Thanks
DP2006
- Home
- Sponsors
- Forums
- Members ˅
- Resources ˅
- Files
- FAQ ˅
- Jobs
-
Webinars ˅
- Upcoming Food Safety Fridays
- Recorded Food Safety Fridays
- Upcoming Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Recorded Hot Topics from Sponsors
- Food Safety Live 2013
- Food Safety Live 2014
- Food Safety Live 2015
- Food Safety Live 2016
- Food Safety Live 2017
- Food Safety Live 2018
- Food Safety Live 2019
- Food Safety Live 2020
- Food Safety Live 2021
- Training ˅
- Links
- Store ˅
- More