Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Definitions for high/medium/low care zones?

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic
- - - - -

Natalia86

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 6 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Female

Posted 16 April 2012 - 01:14 PM

Hello,

Could anyone help me? I am in process of transition the QS towards ISO 22000. My company (ingredients for dairy industry) has 3 production plants, and each of them has different way of explanation of care zones. I would like to unify this according to ISO 22000. I would be extremely grateful for some tips and tools for designation of high, medium and low care zones. Posted Image

Natalia86



Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5666 thanks
1,546
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 17 April 2012 - 03:36 AM

Hello,

Could anyone help me? I am in process of transition the QS towards ISO 22000. My company (ingredients for dairy industry) has 3 production plants, and each of them has different way of explanation of care zones. I would like to unify this according to ISO 22000. I would be extremely grateful for some tips and tools for designation of high, medium and low care zones. Posted Image

Natalia86


Dear Natalia,

As far as i am aware, ISO22000 makes no use of this concept. And also no explicit use of high/medium/low risk categories.

If you look at some of the threads in this forum, it seems one popular origin of the "high care" concept was for chilled, RTE foods. Subsequently the idea has been further interpreted / expanded by some users.

AFAIK, no quantitative definition of these terms exists. I would guess the BRC food standard probably makes the most use of the concept among widely used international documents. Some companies do make an attempt at a form of rationalisation based on risk assessment.

Maybe yr life will become more simplified without it in the near future although the added annoyance of OPRP will probably neutralise any benefit. I suppose it may depend on the product sensitivity but some of the expectations related to high care can be quite extensive, eg this extract from a text on food hygiene auditing -

It is pertinent to remember that a canteen supplying food to staff working in high care areas could easily become the source of food poisoning into the factory if not tightly managed and effectively supervised by trained personnel. High care operators should remove all their overalls prior to using the canteen facility, and preferably take their meals in a designated high care canteen, which is separate from the low care operators.


(Also seems to be suggesting that non-high care operators do not need to remove their overalls ? :smile: )

Rgds / Charles.C

Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C


Thanked by 1 Member:

Natalia86

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 6 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Female

Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:07 AM

Dear Charles,

Thank you very much for your point of view. However, because of some processes (e.g. growth of bacteria's, cutting the stomachs and extracting the calf-rennets) it will be beter to divide the facilities in care zones. I couldn't find any tips about it in ISO 22000, so probably I will use the BRC explanation for this task.

Thx! :rolleyes:
Natalia86



tsmith7858

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 262 posts
  • 52 thanks
10
Good

  • United States
    United States

Posted 19 April 2012 - 05:45 PM

Dear Charles,

Thank you very much for your point of view. However, because of some processes (e.g. growth of bacteria's, cutting the stomachs and extracting the calf-rennets) it will be beter to divide the facilities in care zones. I couldn't find any tips about it in ISO 22000, so probably I will use the BRC explanation for this task.

Thx! :rolleyes:
Natalia86



PAS 220 or the ISO equivalent may have some information. I think it is in section 10 of PAS 220. ISO 22000 is not likely to offer those definitions as they feel it is for each industry to decide.


Natalia86

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 6 posts
  • 1 thanks
0
Neutral

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Female

Posted 20 April 2012 - 07:19 AM

PAS 220 or the ISO equivalent may have some information. I think it is in section 10 of PAS 220. ISO 22000 is not likely to offer those definitions as they feel it is for each industry to decide.


Yes, but it says only that zoning shall be in place. You're right that ISO doesn't provide with this information.
Thanks for your interest!

Natalia86




Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users