We started this in January as part of the new BRC. Sub-divided it into 5 sections, setting objectives, responsibility, timeframes, milestones (for longer term projects), progress (these meetings are quarterly, so we review there) and comments for.....
a) staff training,
b) environmental testing/hygiene,
c) customer complaints,
d) maintenance
e) general improvements / other.
Bit of a box ticking exercise so far, to be honest, but I think it is overall a good addition to the BRC Version 6 as it brings some accountability from other members of the management team into the quality manual. We went a bit mad for the first meeting and scored 1/5, so lowered our expections for the second (currently 3/5! Woo-hoo!). I think this is something BRC auditors will spend the first year of the standard reviewing and building up their knowledge of what can be achieved, so just because this was acceptable this year does not necessarily mean it will be acceptable in 12 months time. I reckon it could be tied in as a verification of the Quality Policy statement as time goes on, i.e. "are funds, training and personnel being supplied by the company up to achieve quality goals?" Not if your quality objectives are not being met.
As Cranberry said, it will depend on your situation. I narrowly lost out having "number of times the quality manager cries himself to sleep" as one after a particularly vicious knife fight with my boss, during which I also lost a slice off of my right testicle. The objective would have been for less than 30 times a quarter.