Ok, lets "assume" this is all new to me. The Z-factor, the D-value everything. I will be doing more research on it but I just want to get in basic terms.
How do I begin? will I be spiking the system? how am I generating this data to plot the thermal curve?
why isn't mircrob. results for the batch after pasteurization enough to say that the system is performing as effectively?
Hi Sharila Kwang.
Milk pasteurization not my area but here is a simplified worked answer to yr query to illustrate the requirements.
pasteurisation calculation.pdf 144.2KB
161 downloads
The above assumes, inter alia, that –
(1) the target species is M. tuberculosis
(2) a reduction of 9 log cycles is acceptable for yr process, ie accepted as achieving destruction of (1)
(3) the system is a HTST, uniform temperature, 1-stage (or 1 relevant stage), continuous pasteurizer
(4) the D value for (1) is available
(5) the z value for (1) is available
In yr specific case, the calculation would be reversed from that shown so that you would measure (a) the time from yr system equipment and (b) the two temperatures. Then calculate back to (i) F0 and then (ii) to the value of (log(N0/N)) which should be >= 9
If yr system does not operationally correspond to above (or the other assumptions), eg has non-uniform pasteurizing temperatures or >1 stage then it will/may be necessary to modify the calculation, eg use software as in previous links for F0 determination. An example of a software program/output is here -
Process Lethality Spreadsheet.xls 122KB
154 downloads
PS - Given that the time/temperature requirements are probably regulatory defined, alternative approaches to above are available and are in fact probably more common, eg -
http://www.nzifst.or...s/httrapps2.htm
PPS - as an example of, seemingly, changed assumptions for (1) and (2) above see -
https://www.uoguelph...-microorganisms
why isn't mircrob. results for the batch after pasteurization enough to say that the system is performing as effectively?
IMEX, this activity would be regarded as verification, not validation. Other interpretations might agree with you that it's validation.