Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Doubt about tapes to make splices in plastic film for packaging

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic
- - - - -

Ana_B

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 16 posts
  • 1 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Spain
    Spain

Posted 25 October 2021 - 08:03 AM

Good morning,

 

 

In our rewinding process we use adhesive tapes to mark the splices between the reels. The suppliers of these tapes aren’ t attached to the food safety regulations so they don’t have certifications that guarantee that their materials are suitable for food use.

 

How do we justify that we can use it?

 

 

Thank you very much



SQFconsultant

    SQFconsultant

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,687 posts
  • 1146 thanks
1,135
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Just when I thought I was out - They pulled me back in!!!

Posted 25 October 2021 - 08:08 AM

Lab testing


All the Best,

 

All Rights Reserved,

Without Prejudice,

Glenn Oster.

Glenn Oster Consulting, LLC -

SQF System Development | Internal Auditor Training | eConsultant

Martha's Vineyard Island, MA - Restored Republic

http://www.GCEMVI.XYZ

http://www.GlennOster.com

 


Foodworker

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 353 posts
  • 234 thanks
32
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 25 October 2021 - 12:12 PM

I am guessing that the tapes are removed either during rewinding or when used by the customer so that his pack doesn't have tape across it.

 

As such, I would consider the tape to be secondary, non food contact and as such should not need to be food contact certified



Scampi

    Fellow

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 5,522 posts
  • 1517 thanks
1,566
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 25 October 2021 - 12:38 PM

I agree with Foodworker

 

Those packages should be reworked or destroyed anyway

 

Last  facility I worked at with film used brightly coloured tape so that it would be removed by the packers (assuming it's manually packed) 


Please stop referring to me as Sir/sirs


Rick Reyes

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 38 posts
  • 11 thanks
19
Good

  • United States
    United States

Posted 25 October 2021 - 01:34 PM

I used to be a bagger operator for 16 years with one of the largest global food manufactures in the world, they used Bosch vertical baggers in our facility and these baggers use tape to splice new rolls to old rolls so I know that these tapes are considered nonfood contact because they seal to exterior of the packaging material. In addition to the tape used for splicing the rolls we used metalized tape to ensure that the packaging material with the splice would be ejected  by the finished product metal detector.



beautiophile

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 254 posts
  • 82 thanks
42
Excellent

  • Vietnam
    Vietnam
  • Gender:Male

Posted 01 November 2021 - 06:21 AM

Metal detectors and metal detectable tapes are expensive. Nowadays, thickness sensors can work well with ordinary tapes.



ESuttmiller

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 66 posts
  • 31 thanks
29
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 01 November 2021 - 04:13 PM

Or you run the splice with no product till it comes out the finished side, cut, discard and go on your merry way. A decent operator can do this in a few minutes (have done it myself on multiple types of packaging machines with various types of films)



Hoosiersmoker

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 693 posts
  • 229 thanks
123
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 03 November 2021 - 06:33 PM

Approved supplier? The tape has to be outside of the bag, yes? Procedure would be discard the bag before, bag with the splice and next bag. No risk of contamination. Our paper from the mills uses this method when winding rolls. Our sheeters detect and automatically discharge about 20 ft before and 20 ft after the splice.





Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users