Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

SQF Quality code - 2.4.1 Customer requirements

Share this

Best Answer , 09 November 2021 - 06:28 PM

i. I would outline your commitment to customer requirements and indicate review frequency (not sure about approval process, for me that's redundant, but that's for me as I'm the only QA person doing everything myself). You may also include here your food safety management policy - attached is a sample for your reference.

ii. Collection and analysis of data for product quality attributes - I would describe your shelf life studies, micro testing, label claim verification to ensure product stability and to meet customer requirements/expectations.

iii. Attached is my SOP for internal/external communication as a sample, hope you'd find some info in it to be useful.


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

rdquality

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 32 posts
  • 2 thanks
1
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 09 November 2021 - 04:51 PM

Hello,

I'm stuck on item 2.4.1 Customer requirements. I have a SOP for customer complaint, but not one to manage consumer expectations. Does anyone have an example of how to write a SOP or Policy for this item?

Thanks!



olenazh

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,364 posts
  • 439 thanks
432
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Toronto
  • Interests:My job, church, reading, gym, horror movies

Posted 09 November 2021 - 05:45 PM

Sorry, I'm not familiar with SQF, my code is FSSC22000 - just trying to help a bit: does it say in the code "consumer expectations", or "customer requirements"? Because, obviously consumers and customers are different groups. If it's though about consumer's expectations I would add to your existing SOP what your target consumers would potentially expect from your products - quality, safety, legality, label accuracy, organoleptic characteristics, appearance, etc. If it's about customer requirements - that would be more for compliance to their own and regulatory standards, plus the abovementioned, plus logistics, financial stuff, etc.



TylerJones

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 104 posts
  • 30 thanks
56
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 09 November 2021 - 06:00 PM

For customer requirements I have always filed that under finished product specifications that is signed off by a sales personnel and the customer. It has all the information that olenazh mentioned. If you are looking for a SOP you could have a blank Specification sheet on file and instructions on how to fill it out and the approval process. 


If you don't like change, you're going to like becoming irrelevant less. 


rdquality

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 32 posts
  • 2 thanks
1
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 09 November 2021 - 06:15 PM

Sorry, I'm not familiar with SQF, my code is FSSC22000 - just trying to help a bit: does it say in the code "consumer expectations", or "customer requirements"? Because, obviously consumers and customers are different groups. If it's though about consumer's expectations I would add to your existing SOP what your target consumers would potentially expect from your products - quality, safety, legality, label accuracy, organoleptic characteristics, appearance, etc. If it's about customer requirements - that would be more for compliance to their own and regulatory standards, plus the abovementioned, plus logistics, financial stuff, etc.

The latest code says:

 

2.4.1.1 The methods and responsibilities for managing customer requirements and/or consumer expectations shall be documented and implemented. They shall include at a minimum:
i. A review and approval process for all new or updated customer requirements, as they occur;
ii. A process for collection and analysis of data for product quality attributes to ensure specifications continue to meet consumer expectations; and
iii. A communication process to notify identified customers when the ability to supply compliant products is temporarily halted.


olenazh

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,364 posts
  • 439 thanks
432
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Toronto
  • Interests:My job, church, reading, gym, horror movies

Posted 09 November 2021 - 06:28 PM   Best Answer

i. I would outline your commitment to customer requirements and indicate review frequency (not sure about approval process, for me that's redundant, but that's for me as I'm the only QA person doing everything myself). You may also include here your food safety management policy - attached is a sample for your reference.

ii. Collection and analysis of data for product quality attributes - I would describe your shelf life studies, micro testing, label claim verification to ensure product stability and to meet customer requirements/expectations.

iii. Attached is my SOP for internal/external communication as a sample, hope you'd find some info in it to be useful.

Attached Files



TylerJones

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 104 posts
  • 30 thanks
56
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 09 November 2021 - 07:47 PM

Approval process for customer requirements are highly important even if you are the only individual signing off. SQF / GFSI schemes are in place for the benefit the safety of food produced as well business continuity and honestly nothing to do with the individual QA person. What happens if the only person that knows the approval process is no longer employed or away from the office? If the OP is creating this procedure for SQF for the first time I highly recommend writing into your policy the process of approval and the sites personnel responsible for signing such document. This is stated in the code. 


If you don't like change, you're going to like becoming irrelevant less. 


Thanked by 2 Members:

rdquality

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 32 posts
  • 2 thanks
1
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 09 November 2021 - 09:05 PM

i. I would outline your commitment to customer requirements and indicate review frequency (not sure about approval process, for me that's redundant, but that's for me as I'm the only QA person doing everything myself). You may also include here your food safety management policy - attached is a sample for your reference.

ii. Collection and analysis of data for product quality attributes - I would describe your shelf life studies, micro testing, label claim verification to ensure product stability and to meet customer requirements/expectations.

iii. Attached is my SOP for internal/external communication as a sample, hope you'd find some info in it to be useful.

Thank you! Very helpful.



zechzplz

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 31 posts
  • 15 thanks
3
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 09 November 2021 - 09:33 PM

Is this for the quality code? I have edition 9, but for me, 2.4.1 is Food Legislation! And it states:

 

2.4.1.1 The site shall ensure that at the time of delivery to customers finished products shall

comply with food safety legislation applicable in the country of manufacture and
sale. This includes compliance with legislative requirements applicable to maximum
residue limits, food safety, packaging, product description, net weights, nutritional,
allergen, and additive labeling, labeling of identity preserved foods, any other criteria
listed under food legislation, and to relevant established industry codes of practice.
2.4.1.2 The methods and responsibility for ensuring the site is kept informed of changes
to relevant legislation, scientific and technical developments, emerging food
safety issues, and relevant industry codes of practice shall be documented and
implemented.
2.4.1.3 SQFI and the certification body shall be notified in writing within twenty-four (24) hours
as a result of a regulatory warning or event. Notification to SQFI shall be by email to
foodsafetycrisis@sqfi.com.


Scotty_SQF

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 380 posts
  • 90 thanks
148
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:hiking, gravel biking, exploring the great outdoors

Posted 10 November 2021 - 04:46 PM

I agree zechapla.  That's what I have for the code too.



rdquality

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 32 posts
  • 2 thanks
1
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 10 November 2021 - 05:10 PM

 

Is this for the quality code? I have edition 9, but for me, 2.4.1 is Food Legislation! And it states:

 

2.4.1.1 The site shall ensure that at the time of delivery to customers finished products shall

comply with food safety legislation applicable in the country of manufacture and
sale. This includes compliance with legislative requirements applicable to maximum
residue limits, food safety, packaging, product description, net weights, nutritional,
allergen, and additive labeling, labeling of identity preserved foods, any other criteria
listed under food legislation, and to relevant established industry codes of practice.
2.4.1.2 The methods and responsibility for ensuring the site is kept informed of changes
to relevant legislation, scientific and technical developments, emerging food
safety issues, and relevant industry codes of practice shall be documented and
implemented.
2.4.1.3 SQFI and the certification body shall be notified in writing within twenty-four (24) hours
as a result of a regulatory warning or event. Notification to SQFI shall be by email to
foodsafetycrisis@sqfi.com.

 

 

 

I agree zechapla.  That's what I have for the code too.

It is for the Quality Code (I indicated it on the topic of the post :) )



Thanked by 1 Member:

TylerJones

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 104 posts
  • 30 thanks
56
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 November 2021 - 05:12 PM

How is a post picked "best answered?"  Approval process is stated in the code as a needed requirement regardless if it is redundant or not. 


If you don't like change, you're going to like becoming irrelevant less. 


olenazh

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,364 posts
  • 439 thanks
432
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Toronto
  • Interests:My job, church, reading, gym, horror movies

Posted 10 November 2021 - 05:20 PM

How is a post picked "best answered?"  Approval process is stated in the code as a needed requirement regardless if it is redundant or not. 

I've mentioned that first, I'm with FSSC, and second - that's my individual circumstances



rdquality

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 32 posts
  • 2 thanks
1
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 10 November 2021 - 05:37 PM

I've mentioned that first, I'm with FSSC, and second - that's my individual circumstances

 

How is a post picked "best answered?"  Approval process is stated in the code as a needed requirement regardless if it is redundant or not. 

 

 

I've mentioned that first, I'm with FSSC, and second - that's my individual circumstances

You were both very helpful. The files provided by olenazh helped me a lot. 



TylerJones

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 104 posts
  • 30 thanks
56
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 November 2021 - 05:56 PM

olenazh- I agree that it is your individual circumstance, however stating redundancy and not writing out approval process for customer requirements said individual would not be in compliance with the  SQF code and a minor nc would be raised if the auditor took the time to read the SOP. 


If you don't like change, you're going to like becoming irrelevant less. 


olenazh

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,364 posts
  • 439 thanks
432
Excellent

  • Canada
    Canada
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Toronto
  • Interests:My job, church, reading, gym, horror movies

Posted 10 November 2021 - 06:08 PM

olenazh- I agree that it is your individual circumstance, however stating redundancy and not writing out approval process for customer requirements said individual would not be in compliance with the  SQF code and a minor nc would be raised if the auditor took the time to read the SOP. 

You're right, if SQF code requires that - it must definitely be done.





Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users