Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

BRC-3.4.1 Internal Audits

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic
- - - - -

khanhhuyen

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 28 posts
  • 1 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Vietnam
    Vietnam

Posted 28 October 2022 - 03:18 AM

sorry can anyone help me with this part 3.4
a risk assessment for the frequency of internal audits
accompanied by internal audit plan for each department according to each clause in the standard


adeletheqa

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 19 posts
  • 7 thanks
4
Neutral

  • Australia
    Australia

Posted 28 October 2022 - 04:19 AM

Hi khanhhuyen,

 

This is how it's done in my workplace.

 

Open the Word document I attached to see the severity table, likelihood table, the matrix, and outcome decision criteria. (it will all make sense when you're looking at it) 

 

Firstly, you'll need to organise a list of the departments, then you can assess them. (Let me know if you need help with this too)

 

 

You need to assess the severity or consequence of NOT auditing each department.

Then assess the likelihood of NOT auditing the department.

 

Even though we always do our internal audits, we chose C (possible) because there is always that possibility that something can get in the way of you doing your job. Although, nothing has ever gotten in the way - internal audits are super important and if you don't get them done, your external auditor will be checking and you'll get an NC. 

 

After assessing each department and giving them a score (all ours are scored at either 13 or 18, which means the frequency is 6 monthly for ones scored at 13, and yearly for ones scored at 18), you can now plan your audits based on risk.

 

 

Hope this helps. Let me know if you have any questions.

 

Attached Files



Thanked by 1 Member:

Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,238 posts
  • 1294 thanks
612
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 28 October 2022 - 05:57 AM

Hi khanhhuyen,

 

I would start with a basic system of 3 x 3 risk assessment for each element of the standard as shown in the attached example where a high severity (3) would be an unsafe or illegal product and high possibility of failure (3) gives a significance of 9 (High Risk).

 

Attached File  BRCGS Food Internal Audit Scheduling.pdf   745.81KB   220 downloads

 

Then schedule high risk internal audits quarterly, medium risk every 6 months and low risk annually.

 

Kind regards,

 

Tony

 

 



Thanked by 1 Member:

khanhhuyen

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 28 posts
  • 1 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Vietnam
    Vietnam

Posted 31 October 2022 - 07:09 AM

thanks everyone



Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,238 posts
  • 1294 thanks
612
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 06 November 2022 - 05:08 AM

Hi khanhhuyen,

 

For your information, the IFSQN offers a Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations that does include internal audit risk assessment and scheduling.

 

This is a 4-hour training session plus exam that is live on Friday, December 02, 2022 or can be taken at your own leisure via the previous recording.

 

This interactive online training webinar enables participants to develop practical knowledge of the principles of internal auditing so that they can participate as part of your internal audit team. The webinar provides instruction on how to implement an Internal Audit system and how to prepare, conduct and report on an internal audit.

 

The course is delivered in 8 sections:

 

1. Introduction to Internal Auditing

2. Auditing Documentation

3. Audit Scheduling and Risk Assessment

4. Internal Audit Procedure including preparation, reporting and practical audit examples

5. Guidelines for Auditing Management Systems based on ISO 19011

6. GFSI and GFSI Benchmarked Standards Internal Audit Requirements

7. Internal Audit Exercise

8. Online test consisting of 25 multiple choice questions covering the topics taught in the course.

 

Kind regards,

 

Tony



khanhhuyen

    Grade - AIFSQN

  • IFSQN Associate
  • 28 posts
  • 1 thanks
1
Neutral

  • Vietnam
    Vietnam

Posted 21 December 2022 - 07:19 AM

Determine the terms to be evaluated for each department
Does anyone have a manual for this part?


Duncan

    Grade - MIFSQN

  • IFSQN Member
  • 76 posts
  • 16 thanks
19
Good

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 26 December 2022 - 07:55 PM

Hi khanhhuyen,

 

This is how it's done in my workplace.

 

Open the Word document I attached to see the severity table, likelihood table, the matrix, and outcome decision criteria. (it will all make sense when you're looking at it) 

 

Firstly, you'll need to organise a list of the departments, then you can assess them. (Let me know if you need help with this too)

 

 

You need to assess the severity or consequence of NOT auditing each department.

Then assess the likelihood of NOT auditing the department.

 

Even though we always do our internal audits, we chose C (possible) because there is always that possibility that something can get in the way of you doing your job. Although, nothing has ever gotten in the way - internal audits are super important and if you don't get them done, your external auditor will be checking and you'll get an NC. 

 

After assessing each department and giving them a score (all ours are scored at either 13 or 18, which means the frequency is 6 monthly for ones scored at 13, and yearly for ones scored at 18), you can now plan your audits based on risk.

 

 

Hope this helps. Let me know if you have any questions.

 

 

 

Hi Adele

 

I believe the risk assessment concerns the risk associated with the activity, not a failure to audit an activity - see the attached screenshot.

 

An easy way of approaching it would be to say fundamental requirements are high-risk activities because a loss of control in those areas could jeopardise food safety, quality, legality and/or authenticity... While non-fundamental requirements are not addressing activities with as high a risk association.... So you could call activities associated with fundamental clauses higher risk, and increase your auditing frequency to reflect that.

 

Similarly, with previous audit performance, you could look at the previous year's audits and identify a selection of audits that yielded a comparatively high level of non-conformance, and increase your auditing frequency to reflect that.

 

The standard isn't looking for an assessment of risk associated with failing to carry out audits. 

 

Hope this helps.

Attached Files


FOOD PORTAL - The web portal dedicated to the food industry

 

Food Portal provides a range of systems and tools for food manufacturers.

 

 Resource Library - Culture Survey - Confidential Reporting - Supplier Directory - Blog


Charles.C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Moderator
  • 20,542 posts
  • 5666 thanks
1,546
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:SF
    TV
    Movies

Posted 27 December 2022 - 02:36 AM

 

Determine the terms to be evaluated for each department
Does anyone have a manual for this part?

 

Hi khanhhuyen,

 

See the methodology  here -

 

http://www.ifsqn.com...dit/#entry95362


Kind Regards,

 

Charles.C




Share this

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users