Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

Allergen cleaning validation method

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic
- - - - -

VDM2024

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 13 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • France
    France

Posted 19 November 2024 - 03:15 PM

Hello,

 

What is the  appropriate quantitative method that we can use to validate the cleaning for allergen risks?

 

 

Regards


  • 0

kingstudruler1

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 1,083 posts
  • 353 thanks
349
Excellent

  • United States
    United States

Posted 19 November 2024 - 03:35 PM

ATP swabs of food contact surfaces

specific allergenic protein testing of food contact surfaces (swabs, rinses, etc)

specific allergenic protein testing of first products produced after cleaning.  


  • 0

eb2fee_785dceddab034fa1a30dd80c7e21f1d7~

    Twofishfs@gmail.com

 


Dorothy87

    Grade - SIFSQN

  • IFSQN Senior
  • 345 posts
  • 90 thanks
109
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:York
  • Interests:Antiques, Art, Sailing

Posted 19 November 2024 - 04:16 PM

Validation = Quantitative (how much allergen is present?) 

 

  • Your sampling validation plan should be discussed with the laboratory (the laboratory must be accredited), talk to them about factory allergens and potential cross-contamination, they should suggest ELISA tests.  
  • Based on the risk assessment you need to establish cross-contamination points - example : Line no.1 produces bars with almonds and, straight after production wants to switch to plain bars. Production is unable to produce plain bars first (this would eliminate your point of cross-contamination) but sometimes this is not possible. In this case, you need to validate your cleaning regime during the changeover. The best practice is to collect three separated tests of 3-4 swabs from points of contact before cleaning and again after, from the same points after cleaning. Focus on difficult-to-clean areas (worst-case scenario)
  • Sometimes, the product is sticky/loose, and particles cannot be removed 100%, hence why most factories decide to use "may contain the statement" unless they are producing products with free-from claims.
  • There is no internationally recognised definition of acceptable allergen levels.
  • ATP swabs and lateral flow devices are good for verification (qualitative). 

You will find more info here : https://www.campdenb...db-0050569719df   and https://www.campdenb...db-0050569719df


Edited by Dorothy87, 19 November 2024 - 04:21 PM.

  • 3



Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users