Jump to content

  • Quick Navigation
Photo

BRCGS clause 6.3.1 - Quantity Check Frequency

Share this

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic
- - - - -

CCrabtreeFS

    Grade - Active

  • IFSQN Active
  • 2 posts
  • 0 thanks
0
Neutral

  • United States
    United States

Posted 02 January 2025 - 10:07 PM

Hello Everyone,

 

I am working on changing some procedures related to how my company conducts quantity checks for packaging final product.

 

We manually weigh out all final product batches into their individual packaging containers, so there is always an operator that is ensuring each container is weighed out to the correct minimum amount. There are times when one operator may only be weighing and packaging 1 container for a batch of product or may have to weigh and package over 100 containers for a batch as we make everything to order and batch sizes can vary greatly. Currently we operate quantity checks as if we had an automated system by conducting checks every 15 minutes during a packaging run for each product, however I feel like this is unnecessary and overkill at times with our manual system.

 

My question is: Can I justify having a set amount of documented quantity checks per product batch, regardless of the amount of containers being packed or time taken to pack? Justification would be what I mentioned above about having each container manually filled and checked by an operator, we also do a twice daily verification of all scales in facility with calibrated check weights, and I have documented trainings and competency checks with all operators that would be packing product showing they can properly read scales and package product. My biggest worry here is with batches that require a large number (50-100) of containers to be packed having the same amount of documented weight checks as a batch that only has 1-2 containers to be packed. BRCGS clause 6.3.1 is very vague and I haven't been able to track down any specific FDA legislation about quantity checking.

 

Any help or thoughts would be greatly appreciated! 


  • 0

G M

    Grade - PIFSQN

  • IFSQN Principal
  • 894 posts
  • 178 thanks
289
Excellent

  • United States
    United States
  • Gender:Male

Posted 02 January 2025 - 10:26 PM

...

My question is: Can I justify having a set amount of documented quantity checks per product batch, regardless of the amount of containers being packed or time taken to pack? ...

 

Say what you will do.

Do what you said you would.

Document it.

 

It doesnt need to be any more complicated than that.  The caveat being that it needs to meet your agreed upon specifications with customers, and it need to be generally compatible with NIST guidelines to meet regulatory requirements for truthful and accurate labeling.

 

If you have well documented calibration records, and your weight/quantity verifications are meeting the expectations in the NIST guideline (limited under count/weight is the main concern for most categories), then you should have nothing to worry about.

 

https://www.nist.gov...andbook 133.pdf


  • 0

Thanked by 1 Member:

Tony-C

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 4,661 posts
  • 1387 thanks
752
Excellent

  • Earth
    Earth
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:World
  • Interests:My main interests are sports particularly football, pool, scuba diving, skiing and ten pin bowling.

Posted 03 January 2025 - 05:52 AM

Hi CCrabtreeFS,

 

:welcome:

 

Welcome to the IFSQN forums

 

From what you describe, you are effectively already carrying out weight checks (albeit unrecorded) as you pack the product.

 

This is a case of recording checks for each batch, I don’t see every 15 minutes for a manual fill operation as excessive but would just record each container weight for the large containers rather than your procedure to be checking every x minutes.

 

In deciding frequency of checks I would consider any customer requirements and your history of weight checks, for example if everything is always spot on or there are issues from time to time.

 

Kind regards,

 

Tony


  • 0

Celebrating 15 years of IFSQN Implementation Packages: 

IFSQN BRC, FSSC 22000, IFS, ISO 22000, SQF (Food, Packaging, Storage & Distribution) Implementation Packages - The Easy Way to Certification

 

Practical Internal Auditor Training for Food Operations - Live Webinar - Friday June 06, 2025 - Also immediately available via the previous webinar recording. Fantastic value at $97/per person, but don’t take our word for it, read the Customer Reviews here

 

Practical HACCP Training for Food Safety Teams - Available via the previous webinar recording. 


Thanked by 1 Member:

GMO

    Grade - FIFSQN

  • IFSQN Fellow
  • 3,422 posts
  • 824 thanks
351
Excellent

  • United Kingdom
    United Kingdom

Posted 30 January 2025 - 07:11 AM

I agree with all of the above but with the challenge on costs nowadays, I'd buy a checkweigher.  You'll probably save an employee.


  • 0

************************************************

25 years in food.  And it never gets easier.




Share this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users